Hi all. Got bitten by this today, have no idea why, and wondered if
anybody has seen anything similar.
A friend has a disk from a dead computer that she wants to retrieve some
data from. Pop it in my machine set as slave alongside my existing
master, BIOS sees it fine, but when I try to boot my
No not a termination issue as I have checked and my previous
kernel has no problem with the 2 controller setup,
absolutely nothing in the boot logs mentioning any problems
with SCSI devices. In fact on boot up all is recognized till
the boot gets to the point of reading init. I sent 3 e-mails
ye
On Sunday 04 February 2001 23:18, suman opined:
> Kindly take personal interest and tell me how to unsubscribe
OK.
Kindly read the bottom of this email, the bottom of the one you replied to
seeking help, the bottom of the one that comes to you that you wrote, and
the bottoms of the many messag
Jack:
This has been noted before as a problem with 3com cards and
I am sure others but I bet they are in fact sharing IRQ's
and if they can not be manually changed via a jumper then
possibly a utility from the manufactures site may be your
answer. 3com has a utility that changes IRQ in DOS and I
> Still struggling with this one and I wondered if anyone could point me
> to some list, newsgroup that could help. One of the updates to the
> stock kernel in RH 6.2 (2.2.14-5 I think) was Updated SCSI error
> handling. Well after I updated my kernel with an smp 2.2.16-3 kernel
> rpm my machine
Good evening Group,
I was looking for some information tonight. Came accross this article on PHP. It is
kind of
funny. If this is out of line for the group I am sorry. I thought that you might get
a laugh out
of it.
http://bbspot.com/News/2000/6/php_suspend.html
Steven
_
Still struggling with this one and I wondered if anyone
could point me
to some list, newsgroup that could help. One of the updates
to the stock kernel in RH 6.2 (2.2.14-5 I think) was Updated
SCSI error handling. Well after I updated my kernel with an
smp 2.2.16-3 kernel rpm my machine is now thr
OK. I know this has been batted around before but I can't go looking through the
archives right now. Does anybody know how to get the second eth1 NIC configured if it
is identical to eth0? I have tried all day and am not getting anywhere. I have set up
the modules.conf as such for the two Links
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 10:48:22AM +0530, suman wrote:
> Kindly take personal interest and tell me how to unsubscribe
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
^^
--
Hal B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTE
Kindly take personal interest and tell me how to unsubscribe
- Original Message -
From: David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: Linux HELP
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
>
> If I may interject ... for t
I back Mikkel.
I once had this problem,but fixed it by changing /etc permissions.
Cheers,
Vineeta
"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I have another question guys. I get this error
> > even when I run 'newaliases'. Or Sendmail -bi.
> > It comes ba
Sounds like a hard disk that *could* be going. Whenever I see these
messages, there's usually either an interface problem or a bad drive.
You could use "fsck.ext2 -f" on the partition(s) on that disk, but you
might want to so a low level scan for problems. I don't have any leads on
low-level or s
It's in beta right now or there abouts. RedHat is pretty good about
releasing one version in the spring, and another in the fall. I'd say
maybe April, perhaps.
Anyone else have a better estimation?
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Eric Clover wrote:
> if i do go to 7, i think ill wait till 7.1. any word on
I will try to get more info on the subject... but I have 193 and 254 as
gateways but they did not work. So, I will have to talk to the guy were we
are getting the IPs from and find out what's going on...
Thanks,
Anthony
- Original Message -
From: "David Brett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[E
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 12:07:17AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I suspect that this is a hardware problem. Is there any utility program
> like scandisk that I can use the detect and fix this kind of problem.
man e2fsck. Run that against umounted partitions, or mounted readonly,
with the -c
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001 22:05:05 Hyung Kim wrote:
>I have a linux cliet with a default gateway. I would
>like to use a dial-up internet connection when the LAN
>is down. Can I do this without removing the default
>gateway?
No.
Just edit ip-up.local and ip-down.local to set the default gatway as ne
Hi,
I have installed redhat 6.1 on PIII for about 1 year and recently the
following error message has started to appear on the login screen:
-
hdb:read-intr:status=0x59 {DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error}
hdb:read-intr:err
"man up2date"
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Richard Critz wrote:
> Where is the documentation for up2date? I can get a little bit with --help
> on the command line (missing the -u option, however) but I can find no docs
> for it on my system.
>
> Thanks,
> -r
>
>
>
>
> ___
Where is the documentation for up2date? I can get a little bit with --help
on the command line (missing the -u option, however) but I can find no docs
for it on my system.
Thanks,
-r
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.re
if i do go to 7, i think ill wait till 7.1. any word on its release??
p.s. (chuck is going to say monday like he always does) :)
eric
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> Eric Clover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ok, on a side note. Can i upgrade my glibc from 2.1.3 to 2.2?
>
> Since this wo
Hello,
I have a linux cliet with a default gateway. I would
like to use a dial-up internet connection when the LAN
is down. Can I do this without removing the default
gateway?
I just spent most of the day trying to figure this out
on my own with no success. Thanks.
Hyung
___
A responder in the comp.emacs newsgroup noted to me that what I wanted
to do can't be done. However, one (I) can find the dvi file that
corresponds to the info files. on my machine, a stock RH7 install,
running into an HP1100A, setup with a postscript driver, 'dvips foo.dvi'
creates a beautiful
Hello all,
Has anyone got xwindows configured for the above laptop using redhat 7.0?
Please advise.
Thanks,
Al
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
___
Well, I can't say I've enjoyed this thread at all, but would like to add
that I completely agree with Harry regarding using a "handle" in this
environment. Friendships are formed, and this is generally a light-hearted
environment, but nevertheless driven by the need to discuss technical
informatio
- Original Message -
From: "John P. Verel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 02/03/01, 11:55:07AM -0500, Charles Galpin wrote:
> > have you tried
> >
> > gunzip -c your_file | texi2dvi | lpr
> >
> Does this effect the source zipped file in any way?
No. Sorry piping to texi2dvi doesn't work. It
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Dave Wreski wrote:
> > What's really fun is that if you *just* give it the IP address, it'll
> > calculate the subnet, etc all for you. ;-)
>
> That's impossible. Perhaps using the standard class structure, but not
> with any variable length type of subnet.
>
That's true. I
> What's really fun is that if you *just* give it the IP address, it'll
> calculate the subnet, etc all for you. ;-)
That's impossible. Perhaps using the standard class structure, but not
with any variable length type of subnet.
Dave
___
Redhat-li
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> > FYI: search freshmeat for 'ipsc' - ip subnet calculator; specify a couple
> > of parameters, hit the go button and everything is calculated for you.
> >
> But thats too easy!
>
What's really fun is that if you *just* give it the IP
address, it'l
Eric Clover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ok, on a side note. Can i upgrade my glibc from 2.1.3 to 2.2?
Since this would involve other RPMs (like the db-packages) and you
also want RPM, I would strongly recommend upgrading to Red Hat Linux 7.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
_
ok, on a side note. Can i upgrade my glibc from 2.1.3 to 2.2? if so, is
there a chance i can bork my machine? is there any advantage to
upgrading to glibc 2.2?
eric
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> Eric Clover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > im looking for recommendations on upgrading from
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>
> > Well, I guess it would cut down on support calls from people that cann't
> > figure out netmasks... After all, who likes converting decimal to
> > binary and back just to figure out how the address
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 03:17:30PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here's some more sample stuff to help out:
Ok... As long as we are getting into this...
I just got redistribution permission from Rob Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
to repost his announcement about his "Secure BIN
Eric Clover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> im looking for recommendations on upgrading from x3.3.6 to x4.0.2.
> should i get the rpms from rh rawhide or the tars from xfree86.org? im
> running 6.2 and have a brand new palit daytona nvidia tnt2 32m vid card.
> i also do not have glibc2.2.
All RPMs
Hello, listees!
I've a client that is using FrontPage 2000 to develop a website, and he is
going to be connected to PostgreSQL via ODBC.
Has anyone been able to get FrontPage to work with PostgreSQL via ODBC? I
should be able to create a DNS with PostgreSQL, and then my client should be
able t
im looking for recommendations on upgrading from x3.3.6 to x4.0.2.
should i get the rpms from rh rawhide or the tars from xfree86.org? im
running 6.2 and have a brand new palit daytona nvidia tnt2 32m vid card.
i also do not have glibc2.2.
thank you in advance
eric
___
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
>
>
> I have another question guys. I get this error
> even when I run 'newaliases'. Or Sendmail -bi.
> It comes back with:
>
> hash map "Alias0": unsafe map file /etc/aliases.db: Group writable
> directory
> WARNING: cannot open alias database /etc/aliases
Funny that, I've had the same idiots banging on mine but with SUNRPC and
POP-2, I just dump them.
Graham.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Sunday 04 February 2001 17:20, Jerry Human opined:
> I have a 20 gig hard drive that was in another machine as /dev/hdc with
> RH 6.2 installed at hdc3. The drive is now in a Compaq Presario 5000P
> series box with ADSL but as /dev/hdb and I want to reinstall RH 6.2 in
> the same partition with
You should find out what the correct settings should be. There is a good
chance another problem will arise. What everybody was saying is correct,
for the ip address supplied, either the netmask or gateway is incorrect.
A netmask of 255.255.255.192
is good for 64 addresses
If the ip address is
I have a 20 gig hard drive that was in another machine as /dev/hdc with
RH 6.2 installed at hdc3. The drive is now in a Compaq Presario 5000P
series box with ADSL but as /dev/hdb and I want to reinstall RH 6.2 in
the same partition with the new box setup. Unfortunately, the boot disk
I made for th
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Ted Gervais spewed into the bitstream:
TG>
TG>
TG>I have another question guys. I get this error
TG>even when I run 'newaliases'. Or Sendmail -bi.
TG>It comes back with:
TG>
TG>hash map "Alias0": unsafe map file /etc/aliases.db: Group writable
TG>directory
TG>WARNING: cannot o
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 06:55:53PM -0400, Ted Gervais wrote:
> I have another question guys. I get this error
> even when I run 'newaliases'. Or Sendmail -bi.
> It comes back with:
> hash map "Alias0": unsafe map file /etc/aliases.db: Group writable
> directory
> WARNING: cannot open alias datab
I have another question guys. I get this error
even when I run 'newaliases'. Or Sendmail -bi.
It comes back with:
hash map "Alias0": unsafe map file /etc/aliases.db: Group writable
directory
WARNING: cannot open alias database /etc/aliases
Cannot create database for alias file /etc/aliases
Do
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Frank Rocco wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I installed redhat 7.0
> I removed Windows ME
> I installed Windows 2000
> How do I get my PC to dual-boot again?
>
> Thanks for the help
>
> Frank Rocco
>
Do you have a boot floppy for RedHAt? If not, get something
like Tom's Boot & Root
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Rupert Heesom wrote:
> I'm running RH6.2, and RPM 3.0.5. I'm trying to upgrade the RPM
> database to RPM 4 so that I can handle the new RH7 RPMs. Supposedly an
> upgrade to RPM 4 is possible without upgrading the entire distro to RH7.
>
> I downloaded the RPMs for RPM 4:
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> JA>Heh... maybe someone'll adapt it to work under linux...
> JA>unless XFS / EXT3 / ReiserFS / JFS is better... :-)
> JA> John
>
> http://www.moongroup.com/stories.php?story=01/02/04/7593554
>
LOL!:-) Kewl... Obviously this is intended to allow
d
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> > Kewl..:-) Will XFS be included as an option in 7.1
>
> Try the beta - we never add new features in the installer after the
> public beta.
>
Ok. Well, when I get ready to upgrade, I'll do that. :-)
Thanks..
John
___
I do this all of the time but when I first learned I read this:
http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/howto/kernel-upgrade/kernel-upgrade.html
On 4 Feb 2001, Rupert Heesom spewed into the bitstream:
RH>I recently found out that I need to upgrade my kernel. I'm running ver
RH>2.2.14-5. According
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Michael H. Warfield spewed into the bitstream:
MHW>On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 09:53:48PM +0100, Gustav Schaffter wrote:
MHW>> Michael,
MHW>
MHW>> I run a caching DNS and it's of course authoritative for my internal
MHW>> private network. (Where I use the .home TLD. Shouldn't get a
I recently found out that I need to upgrade my kernel. I'm running ver
2.2.14-5. According to RH there's an issue with stability when
machines with this kernel are worked hard.My PC seems to fit this
category!
>From what I've read up on upgrading a kernel using RPMs, it's quite a
job. I
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 09:53:48PM +0100, Gustav Schaffter wrote:
> Michael,
> I run a caching DNS and it's of course authoritative for my internal
> private network. (Where I use the .home TLD. Shouldn't get any requests
> for that domain, I believe.)
Hmmm... Probably true... I'll hav
On Sunday 04 February 2001 15:18, Rupert Heesom opined:
> I'm running RH6.2, and RPM 3.0.5. I'm trying to upgrade the RPM
> database to RPM 4 so that I can handle the new RH7 RPMs. Supposedly an
> upgrade to RPM 4 is possible without upgrading the entire distro to RH7.
>
> I downloaded the RPMs
Rupert Heesom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm running RH6.2, and RPM 3.0.5. I'm trying to upgrade the RPM
> database to RPM 4 so that I can handle the new RH7 RPMs.
Red Hat Linux 7 also includes newer version og glibc and many other
libraries - upgrading just rpm is not sufficient.
--
Trond
Hello,
I installed redhat 7.0
I removed Windows ME
I installed Windows 2000
How do I get my PC to dual-boot again?
Thanks for the help
Frank Rocco
I'm running RH6.2, and RPM 3.0.5. I'm trying to upgrade the RPM
database to RPM 4 so that I can handle the new RH7 RPMs. Supposedly an
upgrade to RPM 4 is possible without upgrading the entire distro to RH7.
I downloaded the RPMs for RPM 4: rpm-4.0-4.i386.rpm, and the devel rpm.
When I tried
Michael,
I run a caching DNS and it's of course authoritative for my internal
private network. (Where I use the .home TLD. Shouldn't get any requests
for that domain, I believe.)
"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
> > Any idea of why I get so many packets on port 53? DENY'd so far, but...
>
>
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> Well, I guess it would cut down on support calls from people that cann't
> figure out netmasks... After all, who likes converting decimal to
> binary and back just to figure out how the address fits in the netmask.
>:) (192d is 1100b)
>
> Mi
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, John Aldrich spewed into the bitstream:
JA>On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, David Talkington wrote:
JA>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
JA>>
JA>> John Aldrich wrote:
JA>>
JA>> >> And NTFS, which Microsoft likes to remind us. =)
JA>> >>
JA>> >Really? I didn't know NTFS was a "journa
John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> >
> > 2.2: ext3.
> > 2.4: probably xfs
> >
> > Ext3 is mostly "add journaling to ext2", and is thus pretty
> > stable. XFS is a port from IRIX, and is IMHO the most promising new
> > filesystem. SGI
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> 2.2: ext3.
> 2.4: probably xfs
>
> Ext3 is mostly "add journaling to ext2", and is thus pretty
> stable. XFS is a port from IRIX, and is IMHO the most promising new
> filesystem. SGI even released a preview of it recently - use their
> XFS C
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> How do I get gnupg back into pine again -- I had it before connected to
> pine simply (at least AFAICS) by having installed pine-4.31-2.i386.rpm:
> but after having uninstalled this pine-rpm, the newly *compiled* pine
> doesn't seem to have a link t
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 08:13:43PM +0100, Gustav Schaffter wrote:
> Any idea of why I get so many packets on port 53? DENY'd so far, but...
TCP or UDP? Both are used by DNS but for generally different tasks.
> Yes, I do let in all ! -y packets from my two DNS servers and also from
> the
I compiled and installed PINE 4.33 on redhat 6.1.
And I have gnupg on the machine.
How do I get gnupg back into pine again -- I had it before connected to
pine simply (at least AFAICS) by having installed pine-4.31-2.i386.rpm:
but after having uninstalled this pine-rpm, the newly *compiled* pin
Ya it was right on the money!! Worked like a charm!
Thanks Alot,
Anthony
- Original Message -
From: "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: Routes
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Anthony Capone wrote:
>
> > That wor
John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> > John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Anand Narayanan wrote:
> > > > Wha exactly is JFS ? Where do i find info on it and is it available for linux?
> > > >
> > > I
Any idea of why I get so many packets on port 53? DENY'd so far, but...
Yes, I do let in all ! -y packets from my two DNS servers and also from
the 13 root servers.
Should there be any traffic from the root servers? I run my own DNS with
forwards to the two DNS servers of my ISP.
Regards
Gustav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
If I may interject ... for the newbie, "startx" is a lot safer than
editing inittab ... !
- -d
Paul R. Brandariz wrote:
>Joga Singh wrote:
>
>Change your run level to 5
>
>log in as root and type
>
># init 5
>
>Or edit your inittab and change the line
>
Rats! Responded to the wrong e-mail!
@$)(*
Sorry.
mw
Mike Watson wrote:
>
> I had this happen to me when I first upgraded. I had a Trident Blade video
> card and even though it itially tested OK, subsequently the X server who
> barf. check the values in XF86Config and/or re-run Xconfigurator
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, David Talkington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> John Aldrich wrote:
>
> >> And NTFS, which Microsoft likes to remind us. =)
> >>
> >Really? I didn't know NTFS was a "journaling" file
> >system...
>
> *nod* NTFS is pretty nice. Too bad it lives under such
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Jason P Holland wrote:
> I have been using SGI's xfs for several months now. Its pretty sweet!
> Works great when the power goes out and my box has to recover my mp3 drive,
> which is VERY important! :)
>
ROFL! Can't lose those MP3s... VERY vital data! ;-)
John
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>have ftp enabled. Ramen is resulting in very significant increases
>in port scanning on ports 21 and 111 plus some port probing to 515.
Ah, I had wondered what was up with the poking at 111 ...
- -d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
I had this happen to me when I first upgraded. I had a Trident Blade video
card and even though it itially tested OK, subsequently the X server who
barf. check the values in XF86Config and/or re-run Xconfigurator. I never
did get the Blade running and installed a S3 video card then all was well
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
John Aldrich wrote:
>> And NTFS, which Microsoft likes to remind us. =)
>>
>Really? I didn't know NTFS was a "journaling" file
>system...
*nod* NTFS is pretty nice. Too bad it lives under such a shoddy OS.
- --
David Talkington
Prairienet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been using SGI's xfs for several months now. Its pretty sweet!
Works great when the power goes out and my box has to recover my mp3 drive,
which is VERY important! :)
Jason
>
> On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> > John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Sun
Michael McLeod wrote:
> The next time I booted up Red Hat 7 (with loadlin) after I installed RP8 it
> would not complete the boot. Hung on the start of X . The screen would flash
> on go blank for 20 seconds then a message would appear about var/run/gdm.pdi
> indicated gdm was already running (
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Anand Narayanan wrote:
> > > Wha exactly is JFS ? Where do i find info on it and is it available for linux?
> > >
> > I *think* "JFS" is a "shorthand" term for "Journaling File
Joga Singh wrote:
Change your run level to 5
log in as root and type
# init 5
Or edit your inittab and change the line
id:3:initdefault:
to
id:5:initdefault:
> hi,Please could you help me with the following query. i have
> installed Redhat linux version 6.2 standard (UK) with
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 12:15:19PM -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> Did I miss an update, or do I have a cracker that is out of date? I
> have someone trying to connect up to port 515 (printserver) on my
> firewall. He/she/it isn't having much luck so far... ;-)
Probably someone loo
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, David Talkington wrote:
>
> John Aldrich wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Anand Narayanan wrote:
> >> Wha exactly is JFS ? Where do i find info on it and is it available for linux?
> >>
> >I *think* "JFS" is a "shorthand" term for "Journaling File
> >System" which in itself
Did I miss an update, or do I have a cracker that is out of date? I
have someone trying to connect up to port 515 (printserver) on my
firewall. He/she/it isn't having much luck so far... ;-)
Mikkel
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for you are crunchy and taste good with ketch
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
> I am in trouble. Somehow I have messed up my RH7 system such
> that I no longer can get into graphics mode. Init5 level will not come
> up. I have to use init3 to do anything.
>
> Here is one of the errors I see just before it tries to come up:
>
> Startin
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Anthony Capone wrote:
> That worked!!! Thanks a million!
>
> Anthony Capone
>
Well, I am glad it worked! Your network is still strange. I just hope
I got the format of static-routes correct - it has been a while sence I
had to use it.
Mikkel
--
Do not meddle in the af
David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Assuming this dynamic-ownership phenomenon is normal
It is - take a look at /etc/security/console.perms
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://l
I am in trouble. Somehow I have messed up my RH7 system such
that I no longer can get into graphics mode. Init5 level will not come
up. I have to use init3 to do anything.
Here is one of the errors I see just before it tries to come up:
Starting sendmail: WARNING: Group writable directory /
WARN
John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Anand Narayanan wrote:
> > Wha exactly is JFS ? Where do i find info on it and is it available for linux?
> >
> I *think* "JFS" is a "shorthand" term for "Journaling File
> System" which in itself is a generic term for things like
>
That worked!!! Thanks a million!
Anthony Capone
- Original Message -
From: "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: Routes
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Anthony Capone wrote:
>
> > The IP for the W2K machine is 205.1
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Thornton Prime wrote:
>
> Microsoft does weird things sometimes. I haven't run W2K a lot, but I do
> know that my NT4 machine used to apparently 'round down' my network masks
> to an 8-bit boundary.
>
> Never ceased to piss me off.
>
> thornton
>
Well, I guess it would cut down
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Anthony Capone wrote:
> > The IP for the W2K machine is 205.150.20.254. And I checked it out myself it
> > has the same gateway and netmask...
> >
> Well, you can always cheat and make the netmask
> 255.255.255.0.:-)
Microsoft does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
John Aldrich wrote:
>On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Anand Narayanan wrote:
>> Wha exactly is JFS ? Where do i find info on it and is it available for linux?
>>
>I *think* "JFS" is a "shorthand" term for "Journaling File
>System" which in itself is a generic term for thin
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Anthony Capone wrote:
> The IP for the W2K machine is 205.150.20.254. And I checked it out myself it
> has the same gateway and netmask...
>
> That is why I am stumped!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anthony
>
>
Well, you have a strange network. I can think of two ways to make it
work. One
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Anthony Capone wrote:
> > Hi Gurus!
> >
> > I have a question! I have a redhat system. When I setup the basic host
> > information ie: IP address, Netmask and Gateway. Then I restart the system.
> > If I try to ping the gateway, I ge
Either the netmask, IP or the gateway is wrong. The three don't match.
In any case, your network administrator will probably be pissed if you put
a workstation on a network with the wrong IP, even if you got the netmask
and the gateway right. You could very well be breaking security policies.
At
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Anthony Capone wrote:
> The IP for the W2K machine is 205.150.20.254. And I checked it out myself it
> has the same gateway and netmask...
>
Well, you can always cheat and make the netmask
255.255.255.0.:-)
John
___
Redha
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Anthony Capone wrote:
> Hi Gurus!
>
> I have a question! I have a redhat system. When I setup the basic host
> information ie: IP address, Netmask and Gateway. Then I restart the system.
> If I try to ping the gateway, I get an error that says "destination host
> unreachable.
The IP for the W2K machine is 205.150.20.254. And I checked it out myself it
has the same gateway and netmask...
That is why I am stumped!
Thanks,
Anthony
- Original Message -
From: "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 12:1
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Anthony Capone wrote:
> those are the correct value...as far as I know...
>
> I have setup a Windows 2000 machine with the same values but different IP
> and it seems to work...
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Anthony Capone
>
What is the IP for the w2k machine? To be on the same su
those are the correct value...as far as I know...
I have setup a Windows 2000 machine with the same values but different IP
and it seems to work...
Any suggestions?
Anthony Capone
- Original Message -
From: "Thornton Prime" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, Febru
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Anthony Capone wrote:
> I have a question! I have a redhat system. When I setup the basic host
> information ie: IP address, Netmask and Gateway. Then I restart the system.
> If I try to ping the gateway, I get an error that says "destination host
> unreachable."
>
> IP Addres
Hi Gurus!
I have a question! I have a redhat system. When I setup the basic host
information ie: IP address, Netmask and Gateway. Then I restart the system.
If I try to ping the gateway, I get an error that says "destination host
unreachable."
IP Address: 205.150.20.194
Netmask: 255.255.255.192
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Anand Narayanan wrote:
> Wha exactly is JFS ? Where do i find info on it and is it available for linux?
>
You might be thinking of the filesystem IBM uses in AIX, the technology of
which they contributed to the open source community. Take a look at:
http://oss.software.ib
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
