On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, Terry Therneau wrote:
In a few of my test scripts for the survival code I expect warning messages
(I actually try to trigger a couple). Using R BATCH infile outfile these
messages don't end up in outfile, where I can compare them to what was
expected. I don't see an optio
The issue is that you are using [["weights"]] to add an element. It works
for existing eleents as well as for [<- and $<-.
However, I would have done this without a loop
nm <- c("data", "weights", "subset", "na.action")
extras <- nm %in% names(Call)
temp[ nm[extras] ] <
Dear all,
it looks like that something is wrong with the
/bin/windows/base/rpatched.html page as it seems pointing to the
2.8.1rc version.
Also, I do not know if it is relevant but notice the dates of the
following files on
ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/CRAN/bin/windows/base/
R-2.8.1pat-w
We can do nothing about this: that area is managed by Duncan Murdoch (who
is offline for about a week).
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/ does tell you who to contact.
R-devel is never the right place for question about binary distributions
(nor for CRAN pages, for which report to the CRA
Brian,
Thanks for the comments.
-- I agree that the vector form is more compact. I was using a loop
because I found it to be even more transparent to the class. For a one
time task such as this efficiency is not an issue.
-- I'll make use of eval.parent(). I hadn't yet stumbled on that
-- T
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote:
Brian,
Thanks for the comments.
-- I agree that the vector form is more compact. I was using a loop
because I found it to be even more transparent to the class. For a one
time task such as this efficiency is not an issue.
-- I'll make use
Hello,
1. Illustrating example:
sessionInfo at the end of this email
library(nlme)
fm1 <- gls(weight ~ Time * Diet, BodyWeight)
Variogram(fm1, form = ~ Time | Rat)[1:10,]
Error in FUN(X[[1L]], ...) : unused argument(s) (method = "euclidean")
2. It appears that the error is caused by the sta
Full_Name: Marc Thibault
Version: 2.8.1
OS: Windows XP Pro SP2
Submission from: (NULL) (216.104.125.106)
I had Adobe Acrobat 5 and Adobe Reader 9 installed. The .pdf "open" association
is to Reader.
When I selected "Help | Manuals(in pdf) | An Introduction to R", it brought up
the file in Acrob
marcthiba...@tanda.on.ca wrote:
Full_Name: Marc Thibault
Version: 2.8.1
OS: Windows XP Pro SP2
Submission from: (NULL) (216.104.125.106)
I had Adobe Acrobat 5 and Adobe Reader 9 installed. The .pdf "open" association
is to Reader.
When I selected "Help | Manuals(in pdf) | An Introduction to
>From the Windows (not R) command line try this (the input you
type is after the > and the output is on the next line). Modify
the ftype line appropriately if the output of assoc is different for you.
C:\tmp2>assoc .pdf
.pdf=AcroExch.Document
C:\tmp2>ftype AcroExch.Document
AcroExch.Document="C:
I've stumbled upon a small bug/inconsitency in do_External and do_dotcall:
Here's an example:
% LC_ALL=C R --vanilla < symname-bug.R
R version 2.8.0 (2008-10-20)
*snip*
> options(error=expression(0))
> ## Call 'R_GD_nullDevice' with incorrect parameter count:
> .Call("R_GD_nullD
Thank you, but can we see the patch please (no attachement arrived)?
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, Olaf Mersmann wrote:
I've stumbled upon a small bug/inconsitency in do_External and do_dotcall:
Here's an example:
% LC_ALL=C R --vanilla < symname-bug.R
R version 2.8.0 (2008-10-20)
*snip*
> optio
It seems this was intended to be
distance <- lapply(covar,
function(el, metric) dist(as.matrix(el),
method=metric),
metric = metric)
similarly to Variogram.lme.
Thank you for the report: it will be fixed in t
Excerpts from Prof Brian Ripley's message of Sat Dec 27 06:59:24 +0100 2008:
> Thank you, but can we see the patch please (no attachement arrived)?
I've posted them online:
http://www.statistik.tu-dortmund.de/~olafm/files/symname-bug.R
http://www.statistik.tu-dortmund.de/~olafm/files/symname-
14 matches
Mail list logo
