Brian,
Thanks for the comments.
-- I agree that the vector form is more compact. I was using a loop
because I found it to be even more transparent to the class. For a one
time task such as this efficiency is not an issue.
-- I'll make use of eval.parent(). I hadn't yet stumbled on that
-- The code in lm() is almost exactly my "other approach"! (I doubt
convergent evolution - I must have noticed this example at some past
point).
I was reasoning in parallel to lists
> temp <- list(a=1:3)
> temp[['b']] <- 5:6
> temp
$a
[1] 1 2 3
$b
[1] 5 6
and assumed that this should work for call objects. The informal
"underneath it all, all the language objects are lists" idea, which I
think I absorbed from one of the original Bell Labs books. I leave it
to the core team to decide if this should be 'fixed'.
Terry T.
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
