On 10 April 2014 at 15:58, Martyn Plummer wrote:
| The R configure script is permissive and will enable "C++11" support if
| your compiler accepts -std=c++0x. Obviously you will only get partial
| support for the C++11 standard (But this is also true of some compilers
| that accept -std=c++11). Yo
Le 10 avr. 2014 à 17:58, Martyn Plummer a écrit :
> On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 11:14 -0400, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, wrote:
>>> Le 2013-10-29 03:01, Whit Armstrong a écrit :
>>>
I would love to see optional c++0x support added for R.
>>>
>>>
>>> c++0x wa
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 11:14 -0400, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, wrote:
> > Le 2013-10-29 03:01, Whit Armstrong a écrit :
> >
> >> I would love to see optional c++0x support added for R.
> >
> >
> > c++0x was the name given for when this was in development. Now c++1
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, wrote:
> Le 2013-10-29 03:01, Whit Armstrong a écrit :
>
>> I would love to see optional c++0x support added for R.
>
>
> c++0x was the name given for when this was in development. Now c++11 is a
> published standard backed by implementations by major compilers.
>
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 07:22 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 2 December 2013 at 07:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |
> | Following up on the thread spawned a while back, I just wanted to say that I
> | appreciate today's RSS serving of R-devel NEWS:
> |
> |CHANGES IN R-devel PACKAGE INSTAL
On 2 December 2013 at 07:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| Following up on the thread spawned a while back, I just wanted to say that I
| appreciate today's RSS serving of R-devel NEWS:
|
|CHANGES IN R-devel PACKAGE INSTALLATION
|
|There is _experimental_ support for compiling C++11 code
Following up on the thread spawned a while back, I just wanted to say that I
appreciate today's RSS serving of R-devel NEWS:
CHANGES IN R-devel PACKAGE INSTALLATION
There is _experimental_ support for compiling C++11 code in packages. The
file ‘src/Makevars’ or ‘src/Makevars.win’ should
Le 03/11/2013 22:45, Michael Kane a écrit :
I'd like to echo Whit's sentiment and hopefully warm up this thread.
C++11's new features and functionality give R users low-level tools (like
threads, mutexes, futures, date-time, and atomic types) that work across
platforms and wouldn't require other
I'd like to echo Whit's sentiment and hopefully warm up this thread.
C++11's new features and functionality give R users low-level tools (like
threads, mutexes, futures, date-time, and atomic types) that work across
platforms and wouldn't require other external libraries like boost.
Romain, will y
the right direction.
Thanks for your feedback!
Dirk
| Martyn
|
| From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
[r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] on
behalf of Dirk Eddelbuettel [e...@debian.org]
| Sent: 07 October 2013 01:54
| To: R-devel org
| Subject: [Rd] R 3.1.0 and C+
e
> constraining C++ standard.
>
> Optional support for deployments where C++11 is indeed available seems
> like a
> step in the right direction.
>
> Thanks for your feedback!
>
> Dirk
>
> | Martyn
> | ____
> | From: r-dev
e a
step in the right direction.
Thanks for your feedback!
Dirk
| Martyn
|
| From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf
of Dirk Eddelbuettel [e...@debian.org]
| Sent: 07 October 2013 01:54
| To: R-devel org
| Subject: [Rd
) the macro to remove
this.
Martyn
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf
of Dirk Eddelbuettel [e...@debian.org]
Sent: 07 October 2013 01:54
To: R-devel org
Subject: [Rd] R 3.1.0 and C++11
I would like to bring u
I would like to bring up two issues concerning C++11.
First, the R-devel manuals contain incorrect statements regarding C++11:
i) R-exts.texi:
Although there is a 2011 version of the C++ standard, it is not yet
fully implemented (nor is it likely to be widely available for so
14 matches
Mail list logo
