On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 11:14 -0400, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, <rom...@r-enthusiasts.com> wrote: > > Le 2013-10-29 03:01, Whit Armstrong a écrit : > > > >> I would love to see optional c++0x support added for R. > > > > > > c++0x was the name given for when this was in development. Now c++11 is a > > published standard backed by implementations by major compilers. > > people need to stop calling it c++0x > > > > > >> If there is anything I can do to help, please let me know. > > > > > > Come here https://github.com/romainfrancois/cpp11_article where I'm writing > > an article on C++11 and what would be the benefits. > > > > Unless you are willing to do it yourself currently Rtools on Windows uses > g++ 4.6.3 and that requires that one specify -std=c++0x or -std=gnu++0x . > > Ubuntu 12.04 LTS also provides g++ 4.6.3. > > g++ 4.7 is the first version of g++ that accepts -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 > > More info at: > http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
The R configure script is permissive and will enable "C++11" support if your compiler accepts -std=c++0x. Obviously you will only get partial support for the C++11 standard (But this is also true of some compilers that accept -std=c++11). You may be OK if you just want C99 features, which were missing from the C++98 standard, and features previously introduced in the TR1 extension. But there are no guarantees. Cross-platform support for C++11 is going to remain poor for some time to come, I'm afraid. Martyn ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This message and its attachments are strictly confidenti...{{dropped:8}} ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel