Thanks; fixed now in R-devel. Not an issue on Linux/Mac OS but is on
64-bit Windows, where sizeof(long) is 4.
Best,
luke
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019, Joseph Wood wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think there is an issue in the sampling rejection algorithm in R 3.6.0.
>
> The do_sample2 function in src/main/unique.c
Yay! I re-installed everything and got through "Make distribution"!
I have one more question, please: I am running the make check-all. I have
an error at reg-1d. It stops the process. However, the mean difference
(as per the file) is 2.0e-12. I'm ok with that. How do I bypass this,
please?
Hello,
I think there is an issue in the sampling rejection algorithm in R 3.6.0.
The do_sample2 function in src/main/unique.c still has 4.5e15 as an
upper limit, implying that numbers greater than INT_MAX are still to
be supported by sample in base R.
Please review the examples below:
set.seed(
On 3/1/19 1:52 PM, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> Dear Listmembers,
>
> wanting to learn more about ALTREP I wrote the following function to
> extract a subsequence from an integer vector:
>
> #include
>
> SEXP integer_get_region(SEXP _x, SEXP _i, SEXP _n) {
>int i = INTEGER(_i)[0];
>int n = INTEGE
Dear Listmembers,
wanting to learn more about ALTREP I wrote the following function to
extract a subsequence from an integer vector:
#include
SEXP integer_get_region(SEXP _x, SEXP _i, SEXP _n) {
int i = INTEGER(_i)[0];
int n = INTEGER(_n)[0];
SEXP result = PROTECT(Rf_allocVector(INTSXP, n
> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono
> on Wed, 27 Feb 2019 22:46:04 + writes:
> My points:
> - The 'withCallingHandlers' construct that is used in current 'stopifnot'
code has no effect. Without it, the warning message is the same. The overridden
warning is not raised. The
Hi,
It sometimes happens that some packages get included to R like for example
the parallel package.
I was wondering if there is a process to decide whether or not to include a
package in the core implementation of R?
For example, why not include the Rcpp package, which became for a lot of
user
On 3/1/19 9:43 AM, robin hankin wrote:
Still something wrong. I've uncommented the deb-src lines in
sources.list as you suggested (and I thought it couldn't hurt to try
--allow-unauthenticated as well) and:
So you can try commenting again the sources that are failing, R should
be in universe
Still something wrong. I've uncommented the deb-src lines in
sources.list as you suggested (and I thought it couldn't hurt to try
--allow-unauthenticated as well) and:
root@limpet:/etc/apt# apt-get update --allow-unauthenticated
Hit:1 http://nz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic InRelease
Hit:2 htt
On 3/1/19 9:03 AM, robin hankin wrote:
OK thanks Tomas, but I get
OK~ sudo apt-get build-dep r-base
Reading package lists... Done
E: Unable to find a source package for r-base
OK~
It seems you need to enable source codeĀ repositories on your system
(and then run apt-get update).
You can enab
OK thanks Tomas, but I get
OK~ sudo apt-get build-dep r-base
Reading package lists... Done
E: Unable to find a source package for r-base
OK~
hankin.ro...@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 8:47 PM Tomas Kalibera wrote:
>
> On 3/1/19 7:10 AM, robin hankin wrote:
> > thanks for this guys.
> >
>
11 matches
Mail list logo