This example does not crash in R 2.7.0, R-patched nor R-devel (r45677) for
me (x86_64 F8 Linux.) It also does not crash with the CRAN build of R
2.7.0 on Windows XP.
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 11:10 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi Soeren,
>>
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 08:39 -0400, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 5/10/2008 5:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 11:19 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> >> You will see the current code is different, and your 'fix' is not needed=20
> >> nor applies in R-devel.
> >
> > would be n
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 11:10 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Soeren,
> > "SS" == Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > on Sat, 10 May 2008 05:32:14 + writes:
>
> SS> On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:38 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > OK, I am ju
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 11:10 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Soeren,
> > "SS" == Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > on Sat, 10 May 2008 05:32:14 + writes:
>
> SS> On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:38 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > OK, I am ju
I would not support an extension of kmeans to do this. I think it is
best left simple and fast as it now is.
I can think of three ways you might handle your problem
1. Use, for example, pam() in the cluster package, which does a similar
job to kmeans (not quite the same, of course) with a gene
Hi the devel list,
I am using K means with a non standard distance. As far as I see, the
function kmeans is able to deal with 4 differents algorithm, but not
with a user define distance.
In addition, kmeans is not able to deal with missing value whereas
there is several solution that k-means
On 5/10/2008 5:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 11:19 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
You will see the current code is different, and your 'fix' is not needed=20
nor applies in R-devel.
would be nice...
You failed to provide an example to reproduce the alleged bug, but t
Hi Soeren,
> "SS" == Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Sat, 10 May 2008 05:32:14 + writes:
SS> On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:38 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > OK, I am just sending it here
>> too as it looks like r-devel@r-project.org > i
On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 11:19 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> You will see the current code is different, and your 'fix' is not needed=20
> nor applies in R-devel.
would be nice...
> You failed to provide an example to reproduce the alleged bug, but the=20
well the bug was obvious, I told that I
