On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 11:19 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > You will see the current code is different, and your 'fix' is not needed=20 > nor applies in R-devel.
would be nice... > You failed to provide an example to reproduce the alleged bug, but the=20 well the bug was obvious, I told that I can trigger it and that the proposed fix fixed it - no need to provide an example. > issue does seem to be using lines beyond the documented line length. exactly. one can crash R with too long lines. > So it would have only affected people who did that .... or use auto-generated code like e.g. swig produces. > And generating a new report (PR#11438) was distinctly unfriendly. I did what I was told, reply and keep the PR#11281 in the subject. I am sensing another bug. > If after studing the R FAQ you have a reproducible example in a > current=20 > version of R (R-devel or R-patched), plus add it to *this* report > number. I don't intend to play with devel versions of R, I was just trying to get swig for R2.7 to work. Sorry that it triggered a bug in R. =EF=BB=BFI w= ill try R2.7.1 when it is released and report back. Soeren. ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
