On 5/10/2008 5:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 11:19 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
You will see the current code is different, and your 'fix' is not needed=20
nor applies in R-devel.
would be nice...
You failed to provide an example to reproduce the alleged bug, but the=20
well the bug was obvious, I told that I can trigger it and that the
proposed fix fixed it - no need to provide an example.
But it would be helpful to provide an example, so that we can test the
fix. As Brian told you, your fix was no good: it was not against the
current code.
issue does seem to be using lines beyond the documented line length.
exactly. one can crash R with too long lines.
Then the bug is also in your code, for sending lines that are too long.
R shouldn't crash on user error, but "don't do that" is an appropriate
response.
So it would have only affected people who did that ....
or use auto-generated code like e.g. swig produces.
Then swig should be modified to produce valid code.
And generating a new report (PR#11438) was distinctly unfriendly.
I did what I was told, reply and keep the PR#11281 in the subject. I am
sensing another bug.
If after studing the R FAQ you have a reproducible example in a
current=20
version of R (R-devel or R-patched), plus add it to *this* report
number.
I don't intend to play with devel versions of R, I was just trying to
get swig for R2.7 to work. Sorry that it triggered a bug in R. =EF=BB=BFI w=
ill
try R2.7.1 when it is released and report back.
If you aren't interested in being helpful by testing fixes for your
code, then I doubt if any of us are going to go out of our way to help
you with your errors.
Duncan Murdoch
Soeren.
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
