Re: Zope & python 2.4

2011-12-15 Thread Federico Schwindt
zope is gone. RIP. any OKs on the diff below? On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: > Hi, > > I'm planning to commit this along with the zope/plone removal. > Comments? OKs? > > f.- > > Index: databases/Makefile > ===

Re: Zope & python 2.4

2011-12-14 Thread Federico G. Schwindt
Hi, I'm planning to commit this along with the zope/plone removal. Comments? OKs? f.- Index: databases/Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/databases/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.201 diff -u -p -r1.201 Makefile --- databases/Makefi

Re: Zope & python 2.4

2011-12-13 Thread Remi Pointel
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:51:21 -0300 Federico Schwindt wrote: > Hi, > > The only reason python 2.4 is around is because of Zope. Now, we have > a very old version (2.10) that is long time dead. ITOH, newer Zope > releases work with more recent python versions and most likely will > require newer ve

Re: Zope & python 2.4

2011-12-13 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> Then this just leaves editors/cooledit. Diff below builds but not > really tested as cooledit is currently a barrel of fail on amd64. diff on top of your work... update to 3.17.17 with better comment. i ran it and it works... on amd64 still keeping it as BROKEN untl you check it out. Index:

Re: Zope & python 2.4

2011-12-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/12/13 11:51, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > > Then this just leaves editors/cooledit.  Diff below builds but not > > really tested as cooledit is currently a barrel of fail on amd64. > > > > Index: Makefile > > === > > RCS file: /cvs/p

Re: Zope & python 2.4

2011-12-13 Thread Federico Schwindt
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote: >> Then this just leaves editors/cooledit.  Diff below builds but not >> really tested as cooledit is currently a barrel of fail on amd64. >> >> Index: Makefile >> === >> RCS file:

Re: Zope & python 2.4

2011-12-13 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> Then this just leaves editors/cooledit.  Diff below builds but not > really tested as cooledit is currently a barrel of fail on amd64. > > Index: Makefile > === > RCS file: /cvs/ports/editors/cooledit/Makefile,v > retrieving revision

Re: Zope & python 2.4

2011-12-13 Thread Federico Schwindt
>[..] > No objection, OK. If it's added back in later as a newer version I would > suggest bundling them into a single directory (a la drupal) where they can > easily share common features via Makefile.inc > > There are some support packages which can go too: > > databases/py-ldap,python2.4 > datab

Re: Zope & python 2.4

2011-12-13 Thread David Coppa
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011-12-12, Federico Schwindt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The only reason python 2.4 is around is because of Zope. Now, we have >> a very old version (2.10) that is long time dead. ITOH, newer Zope >> releases work with more recent python vers

Re: Zope & python 2.4

2011-12-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-12-12, Federico Schwindt wrote: > Hi, > > The only reason python 2.4 is around is because of Zope. Now, we have > a very old version (2.10) that is long time dead. ITOH, newer Zope > releases work with more recent python versions and most likely will > require newer versions of Plone, CMF,

Re: Zope & python 2.4

2011-12-12 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:51:21AM -0300, Federico Schwindt wrote: > Hi, > > The only reason python 2.4 is around is because of Zope. Now, we have > a very old version (2.10) that is long time dead. ITOH, newer Zope > releases work with more recent python versions and most likely will > require ne

Zope & python 2.4

2011-12-12 Thread Federico Schwindt
Hi, The only reason python 2.4 is around is because of Zope. Now, we have a very old version (2.10) that is long time dead. ITOH, newer Zope releases work with more recent python versions and most likely will require newer versions of Plone, CMF, etc. Killing Zope and friends will allow us to remo