On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Amit Kulkarni <amitk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Then this just leaves editors/cooledit. Diff below builds but not
>> really tested as cooledit is currently a barrel of fail on amd64.
>>
>> Index: Makefile
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvs/ports/editors/cooledit/Makefile,v
>> retrieving revision 1.37
>> diff -u -p -r1.37 Makefile
>> --- Makefile 2 Dec 2011 14:36:13 -0000 1.37
>> +++ Makefile 13 Dec 2011 13:45:40 -0000
>> @@ -1,12 +1,17 @@
>> # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.37 2011/12/02 14:36:13 espie Exp $
>>
>> +.include <bsd.port.arch.mk>
>> +.if ${PROPERTIES:Mlp64}
>> +BROKEN = crashes all over the place on LP64 arches, missing prototypes
>> +.endif
>> +
>> COMMENT = easy to use, graphical editor
>>
>> CATEGORIES = editors
>> MASTER_SITES = ${HOMEPAGE}
>> -HOMEPAGE = ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/apps/editors/X/cooledit/
>> +HOMEPAGE = ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/apps/editors/X/cooledit/
>> DISTNAME = cooledit-3.17.14
>
> Looking at that website, its not updated in 6 years. Even if you patch
> to latest python 2/3 there are many other graphical text editor
> alternatives in the tree...
Amen to that.
