On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > On 2011-12-12, Federico Schwindt <fg...@lodoss.net> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The only reason python 2.4 is around is because of Zope. Now, we have >> a very old version (2.10) that is long time dead. ITOH, newer Zope >> releases work with more recent python versions and most likely will >> require newer versions of Plone, CMF, etc. >> Killing Zope and friends will allow us to remove lot of crap and if >> someone really needs it she should be using something recent anyways >> so I don't see much point on keeping this. >> So the question is, is anyone using this version of Zope? Any >> objection removing the ports below? >> >> books/zopebook >> www/plone >> www/plone-formgen >> www/plone-ldap >> www/plone-massload >> www/zope >> www/zope-cmf >> www/zope-cmfquickinstaller >> www/zope-coreblog >> www/zope-externaleditor >> www/zope-formulator >> www/zope-fortune >> www/zope-fscounter >> www/zope-genericsetup >> www/zope-groupuserfolder >> www/zope-jtracker >> www/zope-ldapmultiplugins >> www/zope-ldapuserfolder >> www/zope-logger >> www/zope-placelesstranslationservice >> www/zope-pluggableauthservice >> www/zope-pluginregistry >> www/zope-rdfsummary >> www/zope-xmlmethods >> www/zope-zippy >> www/zope-zsyncer >> www/zope-zwiki >> www/zopeedit >> >> Please talk NOW or get them from the Attic later. >> Thanks, > > No objection, OK. If it's added back in later as a newer version I would > suggest bundling them into a single directory (a la drupal) where they can > easily share common features via Makefile.inc > > There are some support packages which can go too: > > databases/py-ldap,python2.4 > databases/py-psycopg,python2.4 > devel/py-mxDateTime,python2.4 > graphics/py-Imaging,python2.4 > textproc/py-ElementTree
Ok for me too.
