On Wed May 30, 2018 at 12:26:18PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/05/29 22:02, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > Simple update to the latest stable version.
> >
> > Tested with 8.1.0026-gtk2-perl-python3-ruby on amd64.
> >
> > :termin runs fine with gvim.
> >
> > Index: Makefile
> > ==
On 2018/05/29 22:02, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Simple update to the latest stable version.
>
> Tested with 8.1.0026-gtk2-perl-python3-ruby on amd64.
>
> :termin runs fine with gvim.
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/ed
Simple update to the latest stable version.
Tested with 8.1.0026-gtk2-perl-python3-ruby on amd64.
:termin runs fine with gvim.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/editors/vim/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.168
diff -u -p -u -
Hi OpenBSD vim users,
simple patch to the last release a day ago. Maybe the last update before
the lock or maybe it's too late already. Anyway, gtk2 FLAVOR works fine
on amd64. Created packages with following FLAVORS:
gtk2-lua
gtk2-perl-python-ruby
gtk2-perl-python3-ruby
gtk2
no_x11-lua
no_x11-pe
Hi ports@,
simple patch level update for vim. Flavor gtk2,python tested on amd64.
Kind Regards,
Rafael
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/editors/vim/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.152
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.152 Makefile
---
On 2014/09/07 17:47, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 10:02:45 +0100 Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>
> > On 2014/09/06 18:52, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
>
> > > googlecode.com now supports downloads of tarballs, so no hg
> > > checkout is needed anymore.
> >
> > If you are s
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 12:58:53 +0100 Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I think what you are proposing might help with a problem I was having
> with vim-command-t. Can you comment?
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=140395978427546&w=2
>
> ---8<---
> we can't install the helptags for the plu
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 10:02:45 +0100 Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2014/09/06 18:52, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> > googlecode.com now supports downloads of tarballs, so no hg
> > checkout is needed anymore.
>
> If you are sure that the generated tarballs are stable, that is ok
Turns out the
Hi Chris,
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 06:52:48PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> Also I moved the openbsd specific files to share/vim/vimfiles and added
> automatic tags building for documentation in vimfiles. This will help
> ports like devel/vim-taglist.
> Am I using the @exec-always / @une
On 2014/09/06 18:52, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here is an upgrade for vim 7.4.430 with the following changes:
> googlecode.com now supports downloads of tarballs, so no hg checkout is
> needed anymore.
If you are sure that the generated tarballs are stable, that is ok
> I disab
Hello,
here is an upgrade for vim 7.4.430 with the following changes:
googlecode.com now supports downloads of tarballs, so no hg checkout is
needed anymore.
I disable the -lang subpackage on the no_x11 flavor, so that it can
include the the documentation for the gui version, too. It still can b
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 01:24:05AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/03/07 16:44, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2013/03/07 16:30, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > > The following diff brings vim to the present day.
> > >
> > > Changes:
> > > - use gpatch instead of patch, lets a lot more patches a
by the way, OK also if pirofti@ want to take maintainership.
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 at 10:24:05 PM -0300, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/03/07 16:44, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2013/03/07 16:30, Paul Irofti wrote:
>> > The following diff brings vim to the present day.
>> >
>> > Changes:
>> >- use gpatch instead of patch, lets a lot more patches appl
On 03/10/13 02:24, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/03/07 16:44, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2013/03/07 16:30, Paul Irofti wrote:
>>> The following diff brings vim to the present day.
>>>
>>> Changes:
>>> - use gpatch instead of patch, lets a lot more patches apply
>>> - include all the
On 7 March 2013, Paul Irofti wrote:
> The following diff brings vim to the present day.
>
> Changes:
> - use gpatch instead of patch, lets a lot more patches apply
> - include all the patches from upstream except 780
> - fix patch 780 and keep it locally
>
> I would also like t
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:58:09AM -0300, Gleydson Soares wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 at 11:30:34 AM -0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I sent a time ago to [1] ports@ a diff that include the openbsd.vim syntax
> style(9) to
> vim/files.
>
> since that you are updating, nice time to ad
On 2011/03/10 11:07, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> Latest dog-pile of patches for vim.
please sync WANTLIBs too.. these are the ones I've checked:-
gtk2 -
Extra: xcb-render-util.0
WANTLIB += GL Xdmcp Xpm Xxf86vm drm xcb-shm
athena -
Extra: Xext.11 pthread-stubs.1 xcb.2
WANTLIB += m
motif -
Extra: Xe
Latest dog-pile of patches for vim.
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
vim.diff
Description: Binary data
On 2010/09/07 16:24, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> I'm shocked. Vim 7.3 has been out for a few weeks and it only has 3
> patches. Works for me on amd64.
please zap REVISION-main, then it's ok with me. I also have this diff
which you might want to add to it (if not then it could be done separately
with a R
Chris Kuethe wrote:
> I'm shocked. Vim 7.3 has been out for a few weeks and it only has 3
> patches. Works for me on amd64.
Works for me on macppc and amd64.
ok kevlo@
Works for me too.
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 04:24:00PM -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> I'm shocked. Vim 7.3 has been out for a few weeks and it only has 3
> patches. Works for me on amd64.
>
> --
> GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
works on amd64 with gcc4
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:53:54AM -0500, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> Giant piles of little patches.
> ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/editors/vim/patches/7.2/README
>
> --
> GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
Giant piles of little patches.
ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/editors/vim/patches/7.2/README
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
vim.diff
Description: Binary data
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:54:19PM -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> two happy vim users already, but i'd like to see some more test coverage
I see a problem with the no_x11 flavor:
===> Building package for vim-7.2.25-no_x11
Create /usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/vim-7.2.25-no_x11.tgz
Error in package
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:54:19 -0700
"Chris Kuethe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> two happy vim users already, but i'd like to see some more test coverage
me 3
using FLAVOR="huge gtk2 perl"
>
> --
> GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
>
--
Ben Calvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
two happy vim users already, but i'd like to see some more test coverage
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
vimupdate.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Working for me on i386.
Brandon
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Simon Kuhnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:56:53AM -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
>> more micropatches, includes some format string fixes.
>
> Works for me on amd64.
> --
> simon
>
>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:56:53AM -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> more micropatches, includes some format string fixes.
Works for me on amd64.
--
simon
more micropatches, includes some format string fixes.
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
vimdiff
Description: Binary data
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:42:45AM -0800, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> i guess it helps if i attach the diff
>
> On Feb 11, 2008 10:37 AM, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Whole bunch of updates, this should also fix the -python flavor.
> > Python users, please test.
The diff fixes the proble
On Feb 12, 2008 7:36 AM, Simon Bertrang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:42:45AM -0800, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> > i guess it helps if i attach the diff
> >
> > On Feb 11, 2008 10:37 AM, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Whole bunch of updates, this should also fix t
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:42:45AM -0800, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> i guess it helps if i attach the diff
>
> On Feb 11, 2008 10:37 AM, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Whole bunch of updates, this should also fix the -python flavor.
> > Python users, please test.
> >
> > CK
> >
> > --
> >
i guess it helps if i attach the diff
On Feb 11, 2008 10:37 AM, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whole bunch of updates, this should also fix the -python flavor.
> Python users, please test.
>
> CK
>
> --
> GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
>
--
GDB has a 'brea
Whole bunch of updates, this should also fix the -python flavor.
Python users, please test.
CK
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
more micro-patches.
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
vim.diff
Description: Binary data
the usual round of vim patches
ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.1/README
sorry about the huge list of patches to be fetched individually - they
rolled patches for non-unix builds into the 1-100 jumbopatch...
CK
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
vimdiff
Descriptio
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/editors/vim/Makefile,v
Retrieving revision 1.82
server -u -N -p -r1.82 Makefile
--- Makefile24 Jul 2007 03:35:341.82
+++ Makefile24 Jul 2007 03:35:34
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ COMMENT-main=
On 5/17/07, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/16/07, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> shiny new vim release... from the website:
>
> "After one year and five days of waiting: a brand new Vim release!
> This is a stable version. There are many bug fixes and updated runtime
> fi
On 5/16/07, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
shiny new vim release... from the website:
"After one year and five days of waiting: a brand new Vim release!
This is a stable version. There are many bug fixes and updated runtime
files. No amazing new features. Upgrading from a previous versi
More little patches. Also, the checksums now have sha256
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
vim.diff
Description: Binary data
the usual round of micro patches
4308 7.0.146 opening file for quickfix may ignore windows already open
8181 7.0.147 session file can be wrong when there are multiple tab pages
1710 7.0.148 no error message for ":call d.foo()" when "foo" doesn't exist
5277 7.0.149 when resizing window
This patch worked for me on 3 separate i386 Systems
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 10/18/06, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
more shiny little patches
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
more shiny little patches
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
vim.diff
Description: Binary data
I added pthread to the wrong flavor. That's fixed. Also, WANTLIB has
been updated.
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
vim.diff
Description: Binary data
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:52:43PM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I was the one that reported the vim problem last night , I thought it
> was a gnome problem so I told Mikolaj Kucharski .
>
> basically under gnome 2.14.2 (Mikolaj is working on a port) when you
> hit the open file butt
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:59:38AM -0600, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> On 9/21/06, Sam Fourman Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >basically under gnome 2.14.2 (Mikolaj is working on a port) when you
> >hit the open file button in the top left hand corner it will lock up
> >gvim
> >and if you open another t
On 9/21/06, Sam Fourman Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
basically under gnome 2.14.2 (Mikolaj is working on a port) when you
hit the open file button in the top left hand corner it will lock up
gvim
and if you open another terminal and use the top program you will see
it is in fact stealing cpu cy
Chris,
I was the one that reported the vim problem last night , I thought it
was a gnome problem so I told Mikolaj Kucharski .
basically under gnome 2.14.2 (Mikolaj is working on a port) when you
hit the open file button in the top left hand corner it will lock up
gvim
and if you open another te
More micropatches from vim.org
I've also heard that gvim (gtk2 flavor) has threading problems under
gnome (ie. because it's not linked with -pthread) so I've added
-pthread in the makefile.
Test.
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
vim.diff
Description: Binary data
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
vim.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:05:07PM -0600, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >this updates vim to 7.0.35. There are a few patches only applicable to
> >the windows or os/2 builds, so I truncate them after fetching them. Is
> >there a cleaner way than th
Joachim Schipper [2006-07-02, 14:00:17]:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 01:34:10PM +0200, Sigfred H?versen wrote:
> > Chris Kuethe wrote:
> > >On 6/30/06, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >>this updates vim to 7.0.35. There are a few patches only applicable to
> > >>the windows or os/2
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 01:34:10PM +0200, Sigfred H?versen wrote:
> Chris Kuethe wrote:
> >On 6/30/06, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>this updates vim to 7.0.35. There are a few patches only applicable to
> >>the windows or os/2 builds, so I truncate them after fetching them. Is
>
Chris Kuethe wrote:
On 6/30/06, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this updates vim to 7.0.35. There are a few patches only applicable to
the windows or os/2 builds, so I truncate them after fetching them. Is
there a cleaner way than that?
robert@ pointed out that I could use egrep to e
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:05:07PM -0600, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >this updates vim to 7.0.35. There are a few patches only applicable to
> >the windows or os/2 builds, so I truncate them after fetching them. Is
> >there a cleaner way than th
Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >this updates vim to 7.0.35. There are a few patches only applicable to
> >the windows or os/2 builds, so I truncate them after fetching them. Is
> >there a cleaner way than that?
>
> robert@ pointed o
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:05:07PM -0600, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >this updates vim to 7.0.35. There are a few patches only applicable to
> >the windows or os/2 builds, so I truncate them after fetching them. Is
> >there a cleaner way than th
On 6/30/06, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this updates vim to 7.0.35. There are a few patches only applicable to
the windows or os/2 builds, so I truncate them after fetching them. Is
there a cleaner way than that?
robert@ pointed out that I could use egrep to exclude unwanted
patchfi
this updates vim to 7.0.35. There are a few patches only applicable to
the windows or os/2 builds, so I truncate them after fetching them. Is
there a cleaner way than that?
CK
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
vim.diff
Description: Binary data
60 matches
Mail list logo
