On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:52:16PM +0200, Johan Zandin wrote:
> After reading the whole license, I don´t think a primary goal for Adobe
> is to forbid BSD systems. It would probably be possible to add FreeBSD,
> NetBSD and OpenBSD as Authorized Operating Systems, if someone cared
> enough to ask
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Ian McWilliam wrote:
the following is wholly unreasonable
*For the avoidance of doubt, no embedded or device versions of the above
operating systems, or any other operating systems, are included as Authorized
Operating Systems.*
After reading the whole license, I don´t t
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:40:03 +1000 Ian McWilliam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> 3. License Restrictions
>
> b. You may not make or distribute copies of the Software, or
> electronically transfer the Software from one computer to another or
> over a network.
That's why pkgs aren't distributed.
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:40:03 +1000, Ian McWilliam wrote:
b. You may not make or distribute copies of the Software, or
electronically transfer the Software from one computer to another or
over a network.
So, even on a "permitted" operating system, you breach t
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:40:03 +1000, Ian McWilliam wrote:
>b. You may not make or distribute copies of the Software, or
>electronically transfer the Software from one computer to another or
>over a network.
>
So, even on a "permitted" operating system, you breach the licence by
dowloading it fro
Nikolay Sturm wrote:
* Ian McWilliam [2006-04-10]:
Yes we care, the following is wholly unreasonable
Pluralis majestatis?
I don't care about the license, as it only covers usage, so every user
has to make up his own mind. I don't see how the port would be affected.
Nikolay
3.
* Ian McWilliam [2006-04-10]:
> Yes we care, the following is wholly unreasonable
Pluralis majestatis?
I don't care about the license, as it only covers usage, so every user
has to make up his own mind. I don't see how the port would be affected.
Nikolay
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
The FreeBSD people just removed their Macromedia Flash plugin ports
after somebody actually read the license and noticed that users are
only allowed to run the player on "Authorized Operating Systems",
which does not include BSD:
http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/dow
On 10/04/06, D. E. Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The FreeBSD people just removed their Macromedia Flash plugin ports
>after somebody actually read the license and noticed that users are
>only allowed to run the player on "Authorized Operating Systems",
>which does not include BS
The FreeBSD people just removed their Macromedia Flash plugin ports
after somebody actually read the license and noticed that users are
only allowed to run the player on "Authorized Operating Systems",
which does not include BSD:
Well, "Macintosh operating systems" could be considered
I read the license before import and it says "Linux operating
systems" are authorized but it's just a kernel, which we happen
to emulate, right?
The phrase, "For the avoidance of doubt, no embedded or device
versions of the above operating systems" might kill that idea.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 01:51:00PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> The FreeBSD people just removed their Macromedia Flash plugin ports
> after somebody actually read the license and noticed that users are
> only allowed to run the player on "Authorized Operating Systems",
> which does not incl
12 matches
Mail list logo
