Nikolay Sturm wrote:
* Ian McWilliam [2006-04-10]:
Yes we care, the following is wholly unreasonable
Pluralis majestatis?
I don't care about the license, as it only covers usage, so every user
has to make up his own mind. I don't see how the port would be affected.
Nikolay
3. License Restrictions
b. You may not make or distribute copies of the Software, or
electronically transfer the Software from one computer to another or
over a network.
c. You may not alter, merge, modify, adapt or translate the Software, or
decompile, reverse engineer, disassemble, or otherwise reduce the
Software to a human-perceivable form.
Ports tend to do these things. I still don't think Adobe is worth
supporting by providing a port for their software. I'd prefer to see
more ports based on the projects at http://osflash.org/
I'd expect that before your port works in any way, you notify the person
using it that they are liable to be sued by Adobe for improper license
usage. Other-wise when Adobe come a knocking, in my defense I'll come a
knockin'
I just don't think it's worth it to the OpenBSD project.
Ian McWilliam
