On 2009/01/21 16:31, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> updated to the this week's new 1.2 version - 1.3 does some nice things
> but is rather heavy on dependencies. msf (maintainer) doesn't necessarily
> agree with staying with 1.2.x but doesn't mind too much either way.
>
> any ok's?
p.s. the old versio
updated to the this week's new 1.2 version - 1.3 does some nice things
but is rather heavy on dependencies. msf (maintainer) doesn't necessarily
agree with staying with 1.2.x but doesn't mind too much either way.
any ok's?
Index: Makefile
==
On 2008/12/12 08:01, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2008/12/12 01:46, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>> On 2008/12/12 09:31, Dongsheng Song wrote:
Is anyone work for RRDtool 1.3.4 ?
>>> i'll probably look at it in a day or two.
>>>
>>
>> ..or sooner.
>>
>> Really lightly tested
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/12/12 01:46, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/12/12 09:31, Dongsheng Song wrote:
Is anyone work for RRDtool 1.3.4 ?
i'll probably look at it in a day or two.
..or sooner.
Really lightly tested in standalone use on amd64 only so far.
Definitely needs much test
On 2008/12/12 01:46, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008/12/12 09:31, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> > Is anyone work for RRDtool 1.3.4 ?
>
> i'll probably look at it in a day or two.
>
..or sooner.
Really lightly tested in standalone use on amd64 only so far.
Definitely needs much testing in other plac
On 2008/12/12 09:31, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> Is anyone work for RRDtool 1.3.4 ?
i'll probably look at it in a day or two.
Is anyone work for RRDtool 1.3.4 ?
2008/12/11 LÉVAI Dániel :
> Hi!
>
> This updates rrdtool-1.2.23 to 1.2.28. Use patch -E, one new patch was
> added, and one removed.
> It's been running for a while on i386 here without problems.
>
> Please test/comment.
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> LEVAI Daniel
> PGP key
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/12/11 10:44, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
PKGNAME-main= ${DISTNAME}p0
this can go completely
-PKGNAME-python= py-rrd-${VERSION}p1
+PKGNAME-python= py-rrd-${VERSION}p0
and remove p0 here
SHARED_LIBS+= rrd 3.0
SHARED_LIBS+= rrd_th 3.0
diff doesn't show any AP
On 2008/12/11 10:44, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> This updates rrdtool-1.2.23 to 1.2.28. Use patch -E, one new patch was
> added, and one removed.
> It's been running for a while on i386 here without problems.
>
> Please test/comment.
> PKGNAME-main=${DISTNAME}p0
this can go completely
> -PKG
On 2007/06/20 23:03, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> This diff resolves the RUN_DEPENDS issues in the previous version
unfortunately, this has repeatable segfaults on sparc64, even with -O0.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01836.html
looks like it may be the same problem (in 1.2.18
On 2007/06/20 23:03, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> This diff resolves the RUN_DEPENDS issues in the previous version
works for me on amd64 (after uninstalling the previous version
to get it built).
basically ok with symon/syweb and smokeping in ports (after updating
the copy in the chroot and ma
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:30:46PM +0900, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> by popular request here's an update to the latest version of net/rrdtool.
>
> I've broken all of the binding stuff up into subpackages and enabled perl,
> python and ruby bindings. I can enable tcl if anyone really needs it.
Holger Mauermann wrote:
> Here is an updated diff that also builds python, ruby and tcl bindings
> as subpackages. Please test.
Seems to work fine but at least the python binding should depend on the
rrdtool package. I don't know if it's the same for the other bindings.
---
Lars Hansson
Holger Mauermann wrote:
> Attached diff updates rrdtool from 1.0.49 to 1.2.18.
>
> Several month ago I already sent an update for rrdtool to ports@, but it
> is still not included in the ports tree... Anything wrong with it?
>
> Please test and comment.
It would be nice if we could have a -pytho
14 matches
Mail list logo
