On 2008/12/12 08:01, LÉVAI Dániel wrote: > Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2008/12/12 01:46, Stuart Henderson wrote: >>> On 2008/12/12 09:31, Dongsheng Song wrote: >>>> Is anyone work for RRDtool 1.3.4 ? >>> i'll probably look at it in a day or two. >>> >> >> ..or sooner. >> >> Really lightly tested in standalone use on amd64 only so far. >> Definitely needs much testing in other places and with the >> bindings. Those using it in a chrooted environment will have >> "a couple" more libraries to copy in... >> >> Index: Makefile > [...] > > Hi! > > Do you plan to completely replace the 1.2 branch in the ports tree > with the 1.3?
that's up to msf@ (maintainer) really, I won't press him for an answer now, I think he has his hands full at the moment :-) The huge list of extra dependencies is not going to be good for people using rrdtool on embedded systems though, and I think that's a reasonably common place to use rrdtool. On the other hand, maintaining two parallel versions in the tree is annoying and can sometimes cause problems. btw, a comment in 1.3 explains a bit more about the bizarre #include ordering you had to patch, apparently it's needed for FreeBSD 4. If you notice in my 1.3 diff, I have added some #ifdef FreeBSD to hopefully make it stay working there too.
