Re: [NEW] deve/codeworker

2010-05-18 Thread Landry Breuil
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:42:21AM +0200, Auclair Vincent wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Landry Breuil wrote: > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:48:20PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> On 2010/05/14 17:22, Landry Breuil wrote: > >> > > >> > The warnings are not really important per se,

Re: [NEW] deve/codeworker

2010-05-18 Thread Auclair Vincent
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:48:20PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2010/05/14 17:22, Landry Breuil wrote: >> > >> > The warnings are not really important per se, lots of ports build fine >> > with TONS of warnings, but at least -Wall mak

Re: [NEW] deve/codeworker

2010-05-14 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:48:20PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2010/05/14 17:22, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > The warnings are not really important per se, lots of ports build fine > > with TONS of warnings, but at least -Wall makes sure they are shown. > > It depends on exactly what they

Re: [NEW] deve/codeworker

2010-05-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010/05/14 17:22, Landry Breuil wrote: > > The warnings are not really important per se, lots of ports build fine > with TONS of warnings, but at least -Wall makes sure they are shown. It depends on exactly what they are of course. For example, if there are implicit declarations (for functions

Re: [NEW] deve/codeworker

2010-05-14 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:49:42PM +0200, Auclair Vincent wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Landry Breuil wrote: > > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:13:46PM +0200, Auclair Vincent wrote: > >> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Landry Breuil > >> wrote: > >> > do-configure: > >> >       �...@true

Re: [NEW] deve/codeworker

2010-05-14 Thread Auclair Vincent
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:13:46PM +0200, Auclair Vincent wrote: >> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Landry Breuil wrote: >> > do-configure: >> >       �...@true >> > oh my.. CONFIGURE_STYLE is here for something, set it to an empty value >>

Re: [NEW] deve/codeworker

2010-05-13 Thread Landry Breuil
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:13:46PM +0200, Auclair Vincent wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Landry Breuil wrote: > > do-configure: > >       �...@true > > oh my.. CONFIGURE_STYLE is here for something, set it to an empty value > > and it will just work :) > > - COMMENT shouldn't start by a

Re: [NEW] deve/codeworker

2010-05-11 Thread Auclair Vincent
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Landry Breuil wrote: > do-configure: >       �...@true > oh my.. CONFIGURE_STYLE is here for something, set it to an empty value > and it will just work :) > - COMMENT shouldn't start by a capital article, remove it > - why installing the static lib ? is it needed b

Re: [NEW] deve/codeworker

2010-05-07 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:46:55PM +0200, Auclair Vincent wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Auclair Vincent > wrote: > > Information for inst:CodeWorker-4.5.4 > > > > Comment: > > A universal parsing tool & a source code generator > > > > Description: > > CodeWorker is a versatile Open Sou

Re: [NEW] deve/codeworker

2010-05-07 Thread Auclair Vincent
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Auclair Vincent wrote: > Information for inst:CodeWorker-4.5.4 > > Comment: > A universal parsing tool & a source code generator > > Description: > CodeWorker is a versatile Open Source parsing tool and a source code > generator devoted to generative programming. G

[NEW] deve/codeworker

2010-05-07 Thread Auclair Vincent
Information for inst:CodeWorker-4.5.4 Comment: A universal parsing tool & a source code generator Description: CodeWorker is a versatile Open Source parsing tool and a source code generator devoted to generative programming. Generative programming is a software engineering approach interested in