On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Landry Breuil <lan...@rhaalovely.net> wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:48:20PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2010/05/14 17:22, Landry Breuil wrote: >> > >> > The warnings are not really important per se, lots of ports build fine >> > with TONS of warnings, but at least -Wall makes sure they are shown. >> >> It depends on exactly what they are of course. For example, if there are >> implicit declarations (for functions returning pointers) or warnings about >> pointer conversions you can expect some problems on LP64 arch... > > Just to make things clear.. _some_ warnings are not important, some like > you mention are to be fixed. Here for codeworker, it's tons of c++ > warnings about variables initialized after/before a superclass member or > smth like that, and tons of #pragma warning. >
New tarball with the Makefile patched. I changed CC to CXX and LFLAGS to LDFLAGS Patches for the warnings are being sent upstream. -- Vincent Auclair - auclair.vincent[ at ]gmail.com (+33) 6 80 77 59 67
codeworker.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
