On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:42:21AM +0200, Auclair Vincent wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Landry Breuil <lan...@rhaalovely.net> wrote: > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:48:20PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> On 2010/05/14 17:22, Landry Breuil wrote: > >> > > >> > The warnings are not really important per se, lots of ports build fine > >> > with TONS of warnings, but at least -Wall makes sure they are shown. > >> > >> It depends on exactly what they are of course. For example, if there are > >> implicit declarations (for functions returning pointers) or warnings about > >> pointer conversions you can expect some problems on LP64 arch... > > > > Just to make things clear.. _some_ warnings are not important, some like > > you mention are to be fixed. Here for codeworker, it's tons of c++ > > warnings about variables initialized after/before a superclass member or > > smth like that, and tons of #pragma warning. > > > > New tarball with the Makefile patched. > I changed CC to CXX and LFLAGS to LDFLAGS > Patches for the warnings are being sent upstream.
This one is good to go, thanks! Landry
