Version 1.6.2.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 03:53:59PM -0300, Gonzalo L. Rodriguez wrote:
; Hi,
;
; Lynis is an open source security auditing tool. Its main goal is to
; audit and harden Unix and Linux based systems. It scans the system by
; performing many security control checks. Examples include
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/telephony/asterisk-openbsd-moh/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -p -r1.18 Makefile
--- Makefile27 May 2014 21:22:29 - 1.18
+++ Makefile25 Sep 2014 20:56:22 -
@@
Moving this discussion to ports.
On 09/23/14 20:45, Stan Gammons wrote:
> I've been trying to get sguil-0.9.0 to work on the Sept 10, 2014 snapshot of
> OpenBSD 5.6, but I keep getting this error when I try to run sguild
> # tclsh
> % package require Tcl
> 8.6.0
> % package require mysqltcl
> co
Hi.
This is an update for ufoai to latest release. All improvements are described
here in changelog:
http://ufoai.org/wiki/Changelog/2.5
Tested on i386, amd64 and macppc. If there is no objections, I'm going to
commit this next week.
ufoai-2.5.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
On 2014/09/25 09:23, trondd wrote:
> Just an update (and apologies for previous top posting and message history)
> but we've only ever seen this error and crash while running xmlto. I would
> think (maybe wrongly) that a stack-protector issue would show up in other
> programs, too.
There certainl
Hi,
When opening an url with dwb from command line, when dwb is already
started and running, this dbus error is returned:
DBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NotSupported: Application does
not handle command line arguments
ex:
> dwb http://http://lists.openbsd.org &
dwb:/usr/local/lib/libestdc+
Just an update (and apologies for previous top posting and message history)
but we've only ever seen this error and crash while running xmlto. I would
think (maybe wrongly) that a stack-protector issue would show up in other
programs, too.
frantisek holop said:
> as you yourself stated, '%' is munched up only on dwb: pages,
> not "normal" ones. looks like two codepaths for processing css?
Dwb does not do processing CSS at all - webkit does it.
Dwb uses these HTML files as format definitions in
g_string_append_printf() function, wh
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:17:57AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014/09/25 11:49, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson said:
> > > This breaks linking in a normal build. I'll go back to your previous tgz.
> >
> > Interesting. Could you please send me a log? For me linking does
does anybody know of a way to allow automatically
subdomains of the current domain all the time?
like {www,static,etc}.example.com
the default behaviour is veeery strict.
-f
--
the best way out of a difficulty is through it.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 02:32:21PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> I don't see much BSD-specific changes in your patches.
It's because they're not BSD-specific, but apparently not required on
Linux distributions.
Especially the crash does not seem to appear on Linux systems.
Henrik Friedrichsen said:
> The latter does not seem to be the case. At least someone reacted to my
> pull including most of the ports patches now.
I don't see much BSD-specific changes in your patches.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas said:
> > IIRC this problem does not manifest itself with glibc.
>
> Does that mean that those settings are passed directly to printf-like
> functions?
Yes. Relevant part of source code is this fragment of "src/html.c":
77if (path && headpath)
78{
79/*
On 2014-09-25, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>> CMake 3.1 (the one with the improved string handling) is scheduled
>> for release on 2014-11-01.
>>
>> Are you ok with just waiting?
>
> Yes, I am ok to wait. Not sure about people doing bulk builds, though;
> I can easily suppose they already hate CMake more
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff, 25 Sep 2014 12:55:
> frantisek holop said:
> > i wouldnt say the priority is trivial... it is rather annoying.
> > could your patch make it to the ports at least?
>
> Patch for port is inlined below.
>
> > more than a year and nobody cares? i suddenly lost a
> > lot of confi
Port maintainer here.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:55:25PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Patch for port is inlined below.
Cool, would love to see this committed.
> IIRC this problem does not manifest itself with glibc. Given that dwb
> was born on forums of Archlinux, and that most of its us
"Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" writes:
> frantisek holop said:
>> i wouldnt say the priority is trivial... it is rather annoying.
>> could your patch make it to the ports at least?
>
> Patch for port is inlined below.
>
>> more than a year and nobody cares? i suddenly lost a
>> lot of confidence in the q
2014-09-25 14:48 GMT+04:00 David Coppa :
>
> Hi all,
>
> An update on the "infamous" cmake segfault:
>
> ---8<---
>
> Core was generated by `cmake'.
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
>
> #0 0x032f500b0484 in strlen (str=0x32ec339fff8 "" 0x32ec33a out of boun
Stuart Henderson said:
> New tgz attached, builds and works for me (tested SIP calls).
Thanks for this excelent work of yours! As always, I feel intimidated.
> - need to draw attention to this horrible license.
> Maybe worth considering moving this to a subpackage (after import).
I plan to even
frantisek holop said:
> i wouldnt say the priority is trivial... it is rather annoying.
> could your patch make it to the ports at least?
Patch for port is inlined below.
> more than a year and nobody cares? i suddenly lost a
> lot of confidence in the quality of the dwb codebase :(
IIRC this p
Hi all,
An update on the "infamous" cmake segfault:
---8<---
Core was generated by `cmake'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x032f500b0484 in strlen (str=0x32ec339fff8 "" ) at /usr/src/lib/libc/string/strlen.c:39
39 for (s = str; *s; ++s)
(gd
On 2014/09/25 11:49, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Stuart Henderson said:
> > This breaks linking in a normal build. I'll go back to your previous tgz.
>
> Interesting. Could you please send me a log? For me linking does not
> break.
Sorry, I didn't keep it, and have limited time at the moment s
2014-09-25 11:06 GMT+04:00 David Coppa :
>
> Hi again,
>
> Elaborating on http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=141045074408704
>
> What about the following diff?
There is a problem: files in this directory are arch-dependant (see
the "ldpaths" file, for example), so they can't go under share. We'll
frantisek holop, 25 Sep 2014 11:56:
> Dmitrij D. Czarkoff, 25 Sep 2014 11:30:
> > This is an old bug in dwb. Please see bug 293[0] for explanation and
> > (probably dated) patch.
> >
> > [0]
> > https://bitbucket.org/portix/dwb/issue/293/get-discarded-in-dwb-templates
>
> the patch seems to be
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff, 25 Sep 2014 11:30:
> This is an old bug in dwb. Please see bug 293[0] for explanation and
> (probably dated) patch.
>
> [0] https://bitbucket.org/portix/dwb/issue/293/get-discarded-in-dwb-templates
the patch seems to be a dead link
https://bitbucket.org/portix/dwb/issue-atta
Stuart Henderson said:
> This breaks linking in a normal build. I'll go back to your previous tgz.
Interesting. Could you please send me a log? For me linking does not
break.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff, 25 Sep 2014 11:30:
> frantisek holop said:
> > when i look at the source of the settings page
> > the '%' are gone:
> [...]
> > but the file on disk looks correct:
>
> This is an old bug in dwb. Please see bug 293[0] for explanation and
> (probably dated) patch.
>
> [0] http
On 2014/09/24 22:57, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Stuart Henderson said:
> > > I could statically link everything into baresip – patching a couple of
> > > makefiles would be enough. I am not sure it is really needed though.
> >
> > This could be done if users of !shared arch want to run it there
On 2014/09/24 22:57, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Stuart Henderson said:
> > > I could statically link everything into baresip – patching a couple of
> > > makefiles would be enough. I am not sure it is really needed though.
> >
> > This could be done if users of !shared arch want to run it there
frantisek holop said:
> when i look at the source of the settings page
> the '%' are gone:
[...]
> but the file on disk looks correct:
This is an old bug in dwb. Please see bug 293[0] for explanation and
(probably dated) patch.
[0] https://bitbucket.org/portix/dwb/issue/293/get-discarded-in-dwb-
there seems to be an issue with the settings
page, the width is too small.
when i look at the source of the settings page
the '%' are gone:
min-width: 600px;
max-width : 90;
width: 95;
width:100;
width: 100;
width: 50;
width: 45;
width: 5;
wi
Hi again,
Elaborating on http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=141045074408704
What about the following diff?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/math/R/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.63
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.63 Makefile
--- Ma
32 matches
Mail list logo
