"Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" <czark...@gmail.com> writes: > frantisek holop said: >> i wouldnt say the priority is trivial... it is rather annoying. >> could your patch make it to the ports at least? > > Patch for port is inlined below. > >> more than a year and nobody cares? i suddenly lost a >> lot of confidence in the quality of the dwb codebase :( > > IIRC this problem does not manifest itself with glibc.
Does that mean that those settings are passed directly to printf-like functions? > Given that dwb > was born on forums of Archlinux, and that most of its users are > Linux-only, I am not sure whether project actually have people with both > commit bit and BSD test stand. -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
