On Jan 29, 2009, at 5:32 PM, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 02:49:42PM -0800, Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
Stuart,
If you follow the entire thread, you will see that i was suggested to
ask this in ports and that's what I did. The answer I got from the
thread in MISC was not what I wa
Here is an update to a newer snapshot of x264 and fixes for the dependent
ports. Please test, especially on macppc.
http://comstyle.com/x264/
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 02:47:25AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> This should go in, either like this or with wavpack added.
> Any objections?
I found it to be considerably less stable than 1.1.15, but security
fixes should probably go in.
> On 2009/01/11 19:45, Brad wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 10,
This should go in, either like this or with wavpack added.
Any objections?
On 2009/01/11 19:45, Brad wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 06:26:52PM -0500, Brad wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 02:21:37AM -0500, Brad wrote:
> > > Here is an update to Xine-lib 1.1.16. A bunch of security fixes
> > >
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 02:49:42PM -0800, Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
> Stuart,
>
> If you follow the entire thread, you will see that i was suggested to
> ask this in ports and that's what I did. The answer I got from the
> thread in MISC was not what I was looking for thus the post in ports.
Th
Stuart,
If you follow the entire thread, you will see that i was suggested to
ask this in ports and that's what I did. The answer I got from the
thread in MISC was not what I was looking for thus the post in ports.
-Parvinder Bhasin
On Jan 29, 2009, at 2:01 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On
On 2009/01/29 13:46, Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
> Isn't mailing list for this purpose only??? instead of bugging
> developers directly.
But, you asked on another list, got an answer, then asked the same
question here, and got the same answer from someone else (who happens
to be the port's maintaine
Thanks Markus. I was just worried that the capabilites issue could be
the reason why I am not capturing anything. If not, then I am ok
there but when you run your instance do you get the same message?
[ crit mgr ] Compiled without support for capabilities, no way
capabilities?
PF is dis
Isn't mailing list for this purpose only??? instead of bugging
developers directly.
Still thanks for spending your PRECIOUS time Rui in writing up this
email and spamming everyone in the ports list with your sarcastic
comments instead of some helpful insight.
-Parvinder Bhasin
On Jan 28,
Here's a resubmittal of c3270. Based on comments by naddy@, PKGNAME
uses pl3. Also, Guillaume Pinot pointed out that the environment should
use LOCALBASE instead of PREFIX.
This doesn't share any libraries with x3270, so I don't believe they
need to be updated together. They do share some utili
Genadijus Paleckis wrote:
>
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2009/01/29 16:58, Genadijus Paleckis wrote:
>>> This is cisco-like configurable interface shell. It works for me on
>>> OpenBSD appliance.
>>>
>>> http://84.32.218.218/files/clish.tar.gz
>>>
>>> Please test and commit.
>> |# Multipl
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009/01/29 16:58, Genadijus Paleckis wrote:
>> This is cisco-like configurable interface shell. It works for me on
>> OpenBSD appliance.
>>
>> http://84.32.218.218/files/clish.tar.gz
>>
>> Please test and commit.
>
> |# Multiple licenses
>
> # BSD, GPLv2 (only),
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 05:28:10PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> What you developers think about this patch from FreeBSD?
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/glib20/files/patch-gio_gunixmounts.c
>
> It would be nice to have a list of mounted devices in the left pane of
> a gtkfile
What you developers think about this patch from FreeBSD?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/glib20/files/patch-gio_gunixmounts.c
It would be nice to have a list of mounted devices in the left pane of
a gtkfilechooser (under "File System")
cheers
-david-
On 2009/01/29 16:58, Genadijus Paleckis wrote:
> This is cisco-like configurable interface shell. It works for me on
> OpenBSD appliance.
>
> http://84.32.218.218/files/clish.tar.gz
>
> Please test and commit.
|# Multiple licenses
# BSD, GPLv2 (only), custom unrestrictive license: see LICENC
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:25:33 +0100, George Koehler wrote:
> I put your port at /usr/ports/x11/dejavu-fonts
New ports that are not (yet) imported into the ports tree are usually
put in /usr/ports/mystuff, c.q. /usr/ports/mystuff/x11/dejavu-fonts.
> I did not add dejavu to my font path, nor test an
This is cisco-like configurable interface shell. It works for me on
OpenBSD appliance.
http://84.32.218.218/files/clish.tar.gz
Please test and commit.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 02:05:10PM +0100, dbd wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:00:18 +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Jonathan Armani
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Do you use the tweak in the MESSAGE ?
> >>
> >> $ cat pkg/MESSAGE-main
> >> Please note
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:00:18 +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Jonathan Armani
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Do you use the tweak in the MESSAGE ?
>>
>> $ cat pkg/MESSAGE-main
>> Please note that some users will need to set the following environment
>> variable to fix
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Jonathan Armani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you use the tweak in the MESSAGE ?
>
> $ cat pkg/MESSAGE-main
> Please note that some users will need to set the following environment
> variable to fix erratic mouse behaviour on their system:
> export SDL_VIDEO_X11_DGAMO
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:38:21AM +0100, Simon Kuhnle wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 02:10:17AM +, Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
> >
> > Update to 1.8.1.
> > I'd appreciate if someone using this can test it as I'm unable at the
> > moment.
> > Thanks,
> >
> > f.-
>
> No problems so
Instead of spamming all the mailing lists you know, you could have
just asked "why the sky is blue" to the port's maintainer.
That's why nepenthes has a maintainer.
As Markus Lude told you before, OpenBSD doesn't support capabilities,
it's safe to ignore this warning.
I've been running nepenthes
Jona Joachim writes:
> Yes, xmonad 0.8 does not compile with ghc-6.10, you have to use the darcs
> version of xmonad. I haven't tried to compile darcs with 6.10 yet.
xmonad 0.8.1 is out, and compile with ghc 6.10 (this is the only
change since 0.8).
> If somebody wants to take a look or test, h
Please, import it.
Regards
-david-
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Tim van der Molen wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:11:44 +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
>> could the poeple making the dejavu fonts port
>> please resubmit it again perhaps updated to 2.28?
>
> Here is a port of 2.28.
>
>> it woul
I'm not sparc expert at all but I'd suspect endianess problems...
This looks suspicious:
d = {x = 0, y = 4.98500718e-39}
...
...
x = -nan(0x7f6121), y = -3.11687118e-15}, I = 1.43043748e-38}
Isn't it?
ciao
-david-
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Alex Popov wrote:
> Sorry for not getting back
25 matches
Mail list logo
