---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118094/
---
(Updated May 20, 2014, 2:39 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been dis
> On May 12, 2014, 1:04 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > That's not correct. Primary, at least, needs to have special treatment and
> > get the 0-named containment assigned always, which is what the current
> > naming is about.
> >
> > As for the rest of the screens it's probably best to so
> On May 12, 2014, 11:04 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > That's not correct. Primary, at least, needs to have special treatment and
> > get the 0-named containment assigned always, which is what the current
> > naming is about.
> >
> > As for the rest of the screens it's probably best to s
> On May 12, 2014, 11:04 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > That's not correct. Primary, at least, needs to have special treatment and
> > get the 0-named containment assigned always, which is what the current
> > naming is about.
> >
> > As for the rest of the screens it's probably best to s
> On May 12, 2014, 1:04 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > That's not correct. Primary, at least, needs to have special treatment and
> > get the 0-named containment assigned always, which is what the current
> > naming is about.
> >
> > As for the rest of the screens it's probably best to so
> On May 12, 2014, 1:04 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > That's not correct. Primary, at least, needs to have special treatment and
> > get the 0-named containment assigned always, which is what the current
> > naming is about.
> >
> > As for the rest of the screens it's probably best to so
> On May 12, 2014, 1:04 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > That's not correct. Primary, at least, needs to have special treatment and
> > get the 0-named containment assigned always, which is what the current
> > naming is about.
> >
> > As for the rest of the screens it's probably best to so
> On May 12, 2014, 11:04 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > That's not correct. Primary, at least, needs to have special treatment and
> > get the 0-named containment assigned always, which is what the current
> > naming is about.
> >
> > As for the rest of the screens it's probably best to s
> On May 12, 2014, 11:04 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > That's not correct. Primary, at least, needs to have special treatment and
> > get the 0-named containment assigned always, which is what the current
> > naming is about.
> >
> > As for the rest of the screens it's probably best to s
> On May 12, 2014, 1:04 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > That's not correct. Primary, at least, needs to have special treatment and
> > get the 0-named containment assigned always, which is what the current
> > naming is about.
> >
> > As for the rest of the screens it's probably best to so
> On May 12, 2014, 11:04 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > That's not correct. Primary, at least, needs to have special treatment and
> > get the 0-named containment assigned always, which is what the current
> > naming is about.
> >
> > As for the rest of the screens it's probably best to s
> On May 12, 2014, 1:04 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > That's not correct. Primary, at least, needs to have special treatment and
> > get the 0-named containment assigned always, which is what the current
> > naming is about.
> >
> > As for the rest of the screens it's probably best to so
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118094/#review57757
---
That's not correct. Primary, at least, needs to have special t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118094/
---
(Updated May 12, 2014, 12:39 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma, Aleix Pol G
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118094/
---
Review request for Plasma, Aleix Pol Gonzalez and Martin Gräßlin.
Reposit
15 matches
Mail list logo
