----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118094/#review57757 -----------------------------------------------------------
That's not correct. Primary, at least, needs to have special treatment and get the 0-named containment assigned always, which is what the current naming is about. As for the rest of the screens it's probably best to sort them rather than keeping them as they come like now. Furthermore, you'll want also to insert the new screens in the correct position then, and shift the rest of the screens. - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On May 12, 2014, 10:39 a.m., Martin Klapetek wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118094/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 12, 2014, 10:39 a.m.) > > > Review request for Plasma, Aleix Pol Gonzalez and Martin Gräßlin. > > > Repository: plasma-workspace > > > Description > ------- > > Even though numbered outputs have their flaws, we still use them pretty much > everywhere and everywhere we use outputs numbered from left to right, so > let's use the same in Plasma. > > This seems to fix most of my multiscreen issues now, namely bug 334500 and > bug 334502. > > Also: > > <mgraesslin> I don't know - having primary as 0 is a bit strange > <mgraesslin> 1, 2, 3, 0 > <mgraesslin> ? > <mgraesslin> that was from left to right > > > Diffs > ----- > > shell/shellcorona.cpp b0b139d > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118094/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Martin Klapetek > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
