Re: Re: Jenkins build became unstable: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #217

Martin GräßlinOn Wednesday 14 May 2014 14:14:26 wrote: > On Wednesday 14 May 2014 12:14:39 KDE CI System wrote: > > See > > seems to be my fault, apparently Jenkins (or openbox) doesn't like my latest > unit test To give some fee

Re: Review Request 118110: [declarative/core] Use proper GLXFBConfig for glxpixmap

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118110/ --- (Updated May 16, 2014, 5:52 a.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 118110: [declarative/core] Use proper GLXFBConfig for glxpixmap

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118110/#review58044 --- This review has been submitted with commit 9653fad2f026aacbd3

Re: Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thursday 15 May 2014 22:37:55 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On Thursday 15 May 2014 12:49:31 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > I really don't want to have an Aurorae theme as default. It would > > undermine > > the fact that I told distros to not do that. We cannot bend ourselves like > > that :-) > > Plan

Re: Review Request 118092: Left and right movement in All music

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118092/#review58040 --- Now if you are on Songs tab, a single left/right key press wil

Re: Review Request 118092: Left and right movement in All music

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118092/ --- (Updated May 16, 2014, 3:18 a.m.) Review request for Plasma, Shantanu Tus

Re: Review Request 118092: Left and right movement in All music

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118092/ --- (Updated May 16, 2014, 3:14 a.m.) Review request for Plasma, Shantanu Tus

Jenkins build is still unstable: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #235

See ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Jenkins build is still unstable: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #234

See ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Jenkins build is still unstable: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #233

See ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: Review Request 118153: remove unneeded file which collides with kf5plasma exports

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118153/#review58035 --- This review has been submitted with commit aa75425637604a87d5

Re: Review Request 118153: remove unneeded file which collides with kf5plasma exports

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118153/ --- (Updated May 15, 2014, 9:10 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thursday 15 May 2014 12:49:31 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > I really don't want to have an Aurorae theme as default. It would undermine > the fact that I told distros to not do that. We cannot bend ourselves like > that :-) Plan B: Use a QtCurve-based windeco together with the QtCurve widget style?

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thursday 15 May 2014, Martin Klapetek wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > > QtCurve is also there for Qt4, no? In that case, can't we share the > > > theme and make both, Qt4 and Qt5 apps looks the same that way? > > > > yes, but we would change it also for thei

Re: Breeze repo

On Monday 05 May 2014, Andrew Lake wrote: > I went ahead and added a 'working' branch and added the following: > going into "resuscitating dead threads" again: can the working branch be merged now? -- Marco Martin ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasm

Jenkins build is still unstable: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #232

See ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: Review Request 116024: Port IconItem to native QSGTexture

: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/plasma-framework-4.99.0git~20140515~09453cf/src/declarativeimports/core/fadingnode.cpp:23:31: fatal error: QtOpenGL/QGLContext: No such file or directory - Hrvoje --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. T

Re: Review Request 118148: KRunner: Add the concept of disabled categories

> On May 15, 2014, 3:26 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > good feature. > > I'm just wondering api-wise if would be better to expose the "positive" > > version of it, enabled categories. > > That depends i guess on how many categories it's planned to have Sure. I can change that. Currently, every

Re: Review Request 118137: Do not overwrite event mask in WindowThumbnailItem

> On May 15, 2014, 5:17 p.m., David Edmundson wrote: > > Can't claim I fully understand the patch, but it all kinda makes sense. > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > my big mission for Akademy: get you all to a state where you fully > understand it! > > David Edmundson wrote: > just before ever

Re: Review Request 118137: Do not overwrite event mask in WindowThumbnailItem

> On May 15, 2014, 3:17 p.m., David Edmundson wrote: > > Can't claim I fully understand the patch, but it all kinda makes sense. > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > my big mission for Akademy: get you all to a state where you fully > understand it! just before everything goes Wayland. What a good

Re: Review Request 118153: remove unneeded file which collides with kf5plasma exports

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118153/#review58012 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Marco Martin On May 15, 2014, 2:57 p.m

Re: Review Request 118137: Do not overwrite event mask in WindowThumbnailItem

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118137/#review58011 --- This review has been submitted with commit 5e057da091d506f17c

Jenkins build is still unstable: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #231

See ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: Review Request 118137: Do not overwrite event mask in WindowThumbnailItem

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118137/ --- (Updated May 15, 2014, 3:32 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 118137: Do not overwrite event mask in WindowThumbnailItem

> On May 15, 2014, 5:17 p.m., David Edmundson wrote: > > Can't claim I fully understand the patch, but it all kinda makes sense. my big mission for Akademy: get you all to a state where you fully understand it! - Martin --- This is an

Re: Review Request 118148: KRunner: Add the concept of disabled categories

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118148/#review58008 --- good feature. I'm just wondering api-wise if would be better t

Re: Review Request 118155: adapt to ecm_add_tests so that tests can be found

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118155/#review58006 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Patrick von Reth On May 15, 2014, 3 p.

Re: Review Request 118153: remove unneeded file which collides with kf5plasma exports

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118153/#review58007 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Patrick von Reth On May 15, 2014, 2:57

Re: Review Request 118137: Do not overwrite event mask in WindowThumbnailItem

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118137/#review58005 --- Been running it since the morning, seems to fix my taskbar-not

Re: Review Request 118137: Do not overwrite event mask in WindowThumbnailItem

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118137/#review58003 --- Ship it! Can't claim I fully understand the patch, but it all

Jenkins build is still unstable: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #230

See ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Jenkins build is still unstable: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #229

See ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: Review Request 118150: Read locale settings from config for Plasma sessions

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118150/ --- (Updated May 15, 2014, 3:02 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 118150: Read locale settings from config for Plasma sessions

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118150/#review57997 --- This review has been submitted with commit 0e31f9622c9c1f557f

Review Request 118155: adapt to ecm_add_tests so that tests can be found

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118155/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, kdewin and Plasma. Repository: plasma-

Re: Review Request 118150: Read locale settings from config for Plasma sessions

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118150/#review57996 --- Ship it! Looks good startkde/startkde.cmake

Review Request 118153: remove unneeded file which collides with kf5plasma exports

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118153/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, kdewin and Plasma. Repository: plasma-

Re: Review Request 118119: remove unneeded header

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118119/ --- (Updated May 15, 2014, 2:54 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 118119: remove unneeded header

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118119/#review57995 --- This review has been submitted with commit c68db518c8ea2199ae

Review Request 118150: Read locale settings from config for Plasma sessions

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118150/ --- Review request for Plasma. Repository: plasma-workspace Description ---

Re: Review Request 118063: New Formats KCM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118063/#review57992 --- This review has been submitted with commit 255bcdbf71abd0d53f

Re: Review Request 118063: New Formats KCM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118063/ --- (Updated May 15, 2014, 2:38 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Review Request 118148: KRunner: Add the concept of disabled categories

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118148/ --- Review request for Plasma. Repository: krunner Description ---

Re: Review Request 116024: Port IconItem to native QSGTexture

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116024/ --- (Updated May 15, 2014, 2:19 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 116024: Port IconItem to native QSGTexture

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116024/#review57991 --- This review has been submitted with commit 096c6d247b6cf688dd

Re: Review Request 116024: Port IconItem to native QSGTexture

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116024/#review57990 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On May 13, 2014, 3:

Re: Review Request 118063: New Formats KCM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118063/#review57988 --- Ship it! kcms/CMakeLists.txt

Re: Review Request 118063: New Formats KCM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118063/#review57987 --- *puppyeyes* shipit? - Sebastian Kügler On May 13, 2014, 2:1

Re: Review Request 118145: Plasma-Active: Port the activity switcher

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118145/ --- (Updated May 15, 2014, 12:55 p.m.) Status -- This change has been di

Re: Review Request 118145: Plasma-Active: Port the activity switcher

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118145/#review57986 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Marco Martin On May 15, 2014, 12:45 p.

Review Request 118145: Plasma-Active: Port the activity switcher

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118145/ --- Review request for Plasma. Repository: plasma-mobile Description --

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

In data giovedì 15 maggio 2014 14:31:27, Martin Klapetek ha scritto: > I'm thinking...would that be a problem? We should perhaps warn users first, > yes, but then it was their choice to co-install it on the very same machine Most distros will *not* ship PN as default configuration. So you might e

Re: Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:28:49 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On 15.05.2014 14:10, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:08:29 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > >> On Thursday, May 15, 2014 13:58:04 Marco Martin wrote: > >>> On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:35:21 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On 15.05

Re: Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > > > QtCurve is also there for Qt4, no? In that case, can't we share the theme > > and make both, Qt4 and Qt5 apps looks the same that way? > > yes, but we would change it also for their KDE 4 setup. > I'm thinking...would that be a probl

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:23:47 Marco Martin wrote: > * install the color scheme in the kf5 *and* kde4 proper folders, that are > different > > * make the breeze color scheme default in both kf5 and kde4 ah, was forgetting: * apply the new icon theme too in both kde4/kf5 as soon we have it --

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On 15.05.2014 14:10, Martin Gräßlin wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:08:29 Sebastian Kügler wrote: On Thursday, May 15, 2014 13:58:04 Marco Martin wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:35:21 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: On 15.05.2014 12:16, David Edmundson wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jens

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:10:15 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:08:29 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Thursday, May 15, 2014 13:58:04 Marco Martin wrote: > > > On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:35:21 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > On 15.05.2014 12:16, David Edmundson wrote: > > > > > On

Re: Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:08:29 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Thursday, May 15, 2014 13:58:04 Marco Martin wrote: > > On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:35:21 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > > On 15.05.2014 12:16, David Edmundson wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jens Reuterberg > > wrote: > >

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 13:58:04 Marco Martin wrote: > On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:35:21 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > On 15.05.2014 12:16, David Edmundson wrote: > > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jens Reuterberg wrote: > > > > > > > > > People always react whatever you do. > > > Do not get

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:35:21 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On 15.05.2014 12:16, David Edmundson wrote: > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jens Reuterberg wrote: > >> Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was > >> coming have happened. Visuals being the most easily

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On 15.05.2014 12:16, David Edmundson wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jens Reuterberg wrote: Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was coming have happened. Visuals being the most easily accessible bit of anything technical, people have reacted negatively

Jenkins build is still unstable: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #228

See ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thursday 15 May 2014 12:21:34 Martin Klapetek wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > The performance will be bad with Aurorae (worse than with Oxygen). The > > crashes > > are now gone as we disabled the multi-threading. > > > > My position doesn't change on that:

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:40:55 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > > Don't we have a plasmoid already for that? That "report a bug" thing? We > > > could have that (or a similar one with warning text) placed on the > > > desktop > > > by default? > > Can somebody with good writing skills whip up something f

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

> > Don't we have a plasmoid already for that? That "report a bug" thing? We > > could have that (or a similar one with warning text) placed on the desktop > > by default? Can somebody with good writing skills whip up something for this? > hm, don't know, a plasmoid is too easy to remove and for

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thursday 15 May 2014 12:15:07 Kai Uwe Broulik wrote: > Am 15.05.2014 12:10 schrieb =?UTF-8?B?SXZhbiDEjHVracSH?= : > > A bit off: > > What do people think about adding an evil dialogue on startup, similar to > > what e17 had - to warn the users about the state of the software and its > > use in

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

> Maybe we could make it the default and in combination with what Ivan is I'm actually not talking only about the style :) -- When the pupil is ready to learn, a teacher will appear. -- Basho ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org http

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

In data giovedì 15 maggio 2014 11:39:00, Jens Reuterberg ha scritto: > The issue WOULD be more ok from my POV if it could be contained towards me > personally but its affecting VDG work not to mention being a massive PR As David said, the feedback on Slashdot and Reddit is *always* negative and

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > The performance will be bad with Aurorae (worse than with Oxygen). The > crashes > are now gone as we disabled the multi-threading. > > My position doesn't change on that: Aurorae is not suited as a default > theme. > This has just never b

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jens Reuterberg wrote: > Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was > coming have happened. Visuals being the most easily accessible bit of anything > technical, people have reacted negatively to the lack of change. > People always re

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

Am 15.05.2014 12:10 schrieb =?UTF-8?B?SXZhbiDEjHVracSH?= : > > A bit off: > What do people think about adding an evil dialogue on startup, similar to > what > e17 had - to warn the users about the state of the software and its use in > production environment? Don't we have a plasmoid already

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

> QtCurve, i would say it's definitely possible. > the thing that doesn't look that right is that is a 3rd party package that > i'm not sure is maintained (since maintainers don't answer) I'm afraid that if we change it, that it will communicate that it is a final and usable version (talking abou

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thursday 15 May 2014 11:39:00 Jens Reuterberg wrote: > Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was > coming have happened. Visuals being the most easily accessible bit of > anything technical, people have reacted negatively to the lack of change. > > The issue WOULD

Jenkins build is still unstable: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #227

See ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

On Thursday 15 May 2014 11:39:00 Jens Reuterberg wrote: > Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was > coming have happened. Visuals being the most easily accessible bit of > anything technical, people have reacted negatively to the lack of change. > > The issue WOULD

Jenkins build is still unstable: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #226

See ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was coming have happened. Visuals being the most easily accessible bit of anything technical, people have reacted negatively to the lack of change. The issue WOULD be more ok from my POV if it could be contained towards me per