In data giovedì 15 maggio 2014 11:39:00, Jens Reuterberg ha scritto: > The issue WOULD be more ok from my POV if it could be contained towards me > personally but its affecting VDG work not to mention being a massive PR
As David said, the feedback on Slashdot and Reddit is *always* negative and mostly unconstructive at all. I would not worry about that too much. > Talking about it we want to raise the issue of including Aurorae and Qtcurve > by default again. I know there are technical drawbacks to this solution - The problem (as someone who does user support) is that you will not expect a homogeneous KF5-based environment with the PN release: in fact most people (the ones that will use PN) will use a mixture of 4.x apps and KF5 stuff. Therefore this should be considered IMO very carefully or the visual inconsistencies that may arise will feel like a double punch in the eyes. Notice that I'm not criticizing the design at all, I *like* it, it's just a matter of consistency. The more PN releases come out and the more apps that get ported to KF5, the less serious this problem will become. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
