Hi,
The current way it is in plasma-desktop is broken imho, as Martin already
pointed out. But I think we should not drop that feature.
My proposal would be a simple checkbox which gives you a "Thu, Feb 6 08:10"
(locale aware of course "Di, 6. Feb. 08:10") in one row. That is a bit longer,
yes
On Thursday 06 February 2014 01:39:33 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> Hey,
>
> what's the plan of getting the date back to the digital clock applet? Do we
> want that? Do we not? Should it go again under the clock (making it really
> tiny I guess)? Ideas?
We used to have that. I just switched to plasma-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115513/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Bugs: 330813
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.
Hey,
what's the plan of getting the date back to the digital clock applet? Do we
want that? Do we not? Should it go again under the clock (making it really
tiny I guess)? Ideas?
Cheers
--
Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Pl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328594
David Edmundson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328593
Bug 328593 depends on bug 328594, which changed state.
Bug 328594 Summary: Plasmoid popup is wrongly positioned
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328594
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328593
Bug 328593 depends on bug 328596, which changed state.
Bug 328596 Summary: Wallpaper from secondary screen can't be changed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328596
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328596
David Edmundson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115447/
---
(Updated Feb. 5, 2014, 5:36 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115447/#review49061
---
This review has been submitted with commit
70de8624a3701db561
> On Feb. 5, 2014, 5 p.m., Shantanu Tushar wrote:
> > Works fine as far as the behavior is concerned.
> >
> > However on a personal note, I am very scared of the complexity we are
> > bringing with this as well as the complexity we have from review #114892.
> > Hope we can get rid of all this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115447/#review49053
---
Ship it!
Works fine as far as the behavior is concerned.
How
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115500/#review49044
---
This review has been submitted with commit
b97e726ae2bd98bc4c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115500/#review49042
---
Ship it!
let's try it (i just fear we would have to uhm, "fix
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115500/
---
(Updated Feb. 5, 2014, 4 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been marked
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115500/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Repository: plasma-framework
Description
---
16 matches
Mail list logo
