Re: Workspace Next Sprint Organization

2012-05-11 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Saturday 12 May 2012 01:27:24 Àlex Fiestas wrote: > On Friday, May 11, 2012 11:23:29 PM Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Would it be possible to also add to the list: > > - Markers both for the whiteboards and black ones for paper > > - A shitload of sticky notes in different sizes and colors > > - Qu

Re: Workspace Next Sprint Organization

2012-05-11 Thread Àlex Fiestas
On Friday, May 11, 2012 11:23:29 PM Kevin Ottens wrote: > Would it be possible to also add to the list: > - Markers both for the whiteboards and black ones for paper > - A shitload of sticky notes in different sizes and colors > - Quite some Blu-Tack, Patafix or equivalent[*] Those for sure >

Re: Workspace Next Sprint Organization

2012-05-11 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Friday 11 May 2012 22:19:31 Àlex Fiestas wrote: > When I come back from SFO I will start together with Aleix the arragements > for the sprint, fromm the top of my head: > > -Whiteboards > -Projectors > -Food > -Car > -Write how to get there Would it be possible to also add to the list: - Marke

Re: Workspace Next Sprint Organization

2012-05-11 Thread Àlex Fiestas
When I come back from SFO I will start together with Aleix the arragements for the sprint, fromm the top of my head: -Whiteboards -Projectors -Food -Car -Write how to get there So I'm going to add to that list: -Webcam, Microphone. We will have "wired" internet connection so it should be stable

Re: Workspace Next Sprint Organization

2012-05-11 Thread Àlex Fiestas
On Friday, May 11, 2012 09:55:30 AM Marco Martin wrote: > then whatever the results are is something that we can walk trough the > implementation of it, what's doable, not so much, what will require > changes in the platform and so on (at akademy?) Indeed, Akademy is close enough to delay some disc

Re: Plasma::Service API addition

2012-05-11 Thread Alex Merry
On 11/05/12 12:18, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Friday, May 11, 2012 11:59:59 Alex Merry wrote: What's the best thing to do here? i just reviewed the change; it can go in imho. it's a short term fix, though, as we need to chnage this for libplasma2... It's probably worth considering the interact

Re: Review Request: Do not reset Plasma::RunnerModel when new matches are added

2012-05-11 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
> On May 11, 2012, 3:29 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > was just that sroting with a proxy tends to cause the same flickering > > problems, but yeah, for now go for it, we can always optimize after ;) Just committed it. Do you mind if I apply the patch to the KDE/4.8 branch as well? - Aurélien

Re: Review Request: Do not reset Plasma::RunnerModel when new matches are added

2012-05-11 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104917/#review13725 --- Ship it! was just that sroting with a proxy tends to cause the

Re: Review Request: Do not reset Plasma::RunnerModel when new matches are added

2012-05-11 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
> On May 11, 2012, 2:36 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > I think is in the good direction, what would be cool is to insert rows in > > order of descendednt relevancy, even if a more relevant row arrives after > > the already existing ones I see the advantage of sorting by relevancy, but I am a bi

Re: Review Request: Do not reset Plasma::RunnerModel when new matches are added

2012-05-11 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104917/#review13719 --- I think is in the good direction, what would be cool is to inse

Re: Review Request: Do not reset Plasma::RunnerModel when new matches are added

2012-05-11 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104917/ --- (Updated May 11, 2012, 2:13 p.m.) Review request for Plasma and Aaron J. S

Review Request: Do not reset Plasma::RunnerModel when new matches are added

2012-05-11 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104917/ --- Review request for Plasma and Aaron J. Seigo. Description --- When Ru

Re: mpris2 engine and nowplaying QML applet

2012-05-11 Thread Alex Merry
On 10/05/12 12:13, Alex Merry wrote: > Thanks. I've applied all your suggestions to the scratch repo. I'll > probably commit to kde-workspace and kdeplasma-addons tomorrow morning, > I imagine (or whenever I'm next on my home computer). Done. ___ Plas

Re: Review Request: Allow QML items to be associated with operations in Plasma::Service

2012-05-11 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104760/#review13711 --- This review has been submitted with commit ea5317d9e2beacd1c5d

Re: Plasma::Service API addition

2012-05-11 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday, May 11, 2012 11:59:59 Alex Merry wrote: > What's the best thing to do here? i just reviewed the change; it can go in imho. it's a short term fix, though, as we need to chnage this for libplasma2... -- Aaron Seigo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. __

Re: Review Request: Allow QML items to be associated with operations in Plasma::Service

2012-05-11 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104760/#review13710 --- Ship it! this is fine for libplasma1; but really we'll need so

Plasma::Service API addition

2012-05-11 Thread Alex Merry
So I was about to commit the new nowplaying QML plasmoid to kdeplasma-addons, when I realised that it depends on the API additions in https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104760/, which doesn't appear to have been looked at. Now we're actually past the soft feature freeze, and while I put the mpris2

Re: Workspace Next Sprint Organization

2012-05-11 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Le vendredi 11 mai 2012 09:20:27 Aaron J. Seigo a écrit : > On Thursday, May 10, 2012 17:25:18 Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > us in the organization, and if you are ok with us doing this job. > > i think it is great you 3 are taking this on... > > while i will not be there, i would be interested in doin

Re: Re: Workspace Next Sprint Organization

2012-05-11 Thread Marco Martin
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Friday 11 May 2012 09:29:29 Ivan Čukić wrote: >> > while i will not be there, i would be interested in doing a remote >> > presentation, e.g. video over the net. let me know if that would be of >> >> It'd be nice if the presentation (and

Re: Re: Workspace Next Sprint Organization

2012-05-11 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Friday 11 May 2012 09:29:29 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > while i will not be there, i would be interested in doing a remote > > presentation, e.g. video over the net. let me know if that would be of > > It'd be nice if the presentation (and more) would be on a (for > example) G+ hangout so that a few o

Re: Workspace Next Sprint Organization

2012-05-11 Thread Ivan Čukić
> while i will not be there, i would be interested in doing a remote > presentation, e.g. video over the net. let me know if that would be of It'd be nice if the presentation (and more) would be on a (for example) G+ hangout so that a few of us can watch it. --- On a different note, I've wrote a

Re: Workspace Next Sprint Organization

2012-05-11 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 17:25:18 Àlex Fiestas wrote: > us in the organization, and if you are ok with us doing this job. i think it is great you 3 are taking this on... while i will not be there, i would be interested in doing a remote presentation, e.g. video over the net. let me know if that