Re: [Pan-users] Re: pan-0.119 issue

2006-11-16 Thread Per Hedeland
Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Many distributions eliminate core in runtime. On Fedora, you have to >enable them in /etc/sysconfig/init by adding > >DAEMON_COREFILE_LIMIT=unlimited > >and then in /etc/profile comment out line saying > >ulimit -S -c 0 > /dev/null 2>&1 > >and in /etc/securi

Re: [Pan-users] Re: pan-0.119 issue

2006-11-16 Thread walt
Duncan wrote: ... > FWIW, I returned to glibc-2.4-r4 (had to hack portage to get it to do it > since the package has a safety feature preventing downgrades, and my > non-pan issue is gone, as I expected it would be from an earlier test. > I'm not sure about the pan crashes as they were rather less

Re: [Pan-users] Re: pan-0.119 issue

2006-11-14 Thread John Aldrich
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 4:43 pm, Charles Kerr wrote: > > No, there's no limit on how many tasks you can have in Pan. > I've had thousands, and have fixed bugs for users having > hundreds of thousands of tasks. :) > Ok... might have been an issue with MY system then... *shrug* Who knows... :-) >

Re: [Pan-users] Re: pan-0.119 issue

2006-11-14 Thread Charles Kerr
John Aldrich wrote: On Tuesday 14 November 2006 4:38 am, Duncan wrote: Just noting for others reading now or from the archives that a bug has been filed (with several duplicates already) and is being looked into. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354779 For reference tho, sometimes get

Re: [Pan-users] Re: pan-0.119 issue

2006-11-14 Thread John Aldrich
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 4:38 am, Duncan wrote: > > Just noting for others reading now or from the archives that a bug has > been filed (with several duplicates already) and is being looked into. > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354779 > > For reference tho, sometimes getting a disc