Duncan wrote: ... > FWIW, I returned to glibc-2.4-r4 (had to hack portage to get it to do it > since the package has a safety feature preventing downgrades, and my > non-pan issue is gone, as I expected it would be from an earlier test. > I'm not sure about the pan crashes as they were rather less frequent and > thus harder to duplicate, but so far, so good. =8^)...
I'm afraid I'm seeing the same pan problem with glibc-2.4-r4, but it's rare, so I'm at a loss to trigger it on purpose. I guess running pan from gdb every time might catch it. _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
