walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:06:38
-0800:
> Duncan wrote:
> ...
>> FWIW, I returned to glibc-2.4-r4 (had to hack portage to get it to do it
>> since the package has a safety feature preventing downgrades, and my
>> non-pan issue is gon
Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Many distributions eliminate core in runtime. On Fedora, you have to
>enable them in /etc/sysconfig/init by adding
>
>DAEMON_COREFILE_LIMIT=unlimited
>
>and then in /etc/profile comment out line saying
>
>ulimit -S -c 0 > /dev/null 2>&1
>
>and in /etc/securi
Duncan wrote:
...
> FWIW, I returned to glibc-2.4-r4 (had to hack portage to get it to do it
> since the package has a safety feature preventing downgrades, and my
> non-pan issue is gone, as I expected it would be from an earlier test.
> I'm not sure about the pan crashes as they were rather less
Duncan scripst:
> Answering the question, core files are a system thing, not pan. I don't
> know if it's a Linux-only feature or if the BSDs have it as well, and
core files are from the earliest days of Unix, so they should be available
everywhere the name of Kerningham & Ritchie is held in honor
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 15 Nov 2006 03:37:39
+:
> Core files... good idea and I might have to do the same, since I'm seeing
> a problem that doesn't want to duplicate when I'm running from anywhere
> with STDOUT/STDERR open or with gdb att
John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 14 Nov
2006 19:28:15 -0500:
>> IMO you should enable core files or, when running Pan overnight,
>> run it in gdb so that you can get a backtrace.
>>
> Hmm... is that a config file option or a compile-time option (
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 4:43 pm, Charles Kerr wrote:
>
> No, there's no limit on how many tasks you can have in Pan.
> I've had thousands, and have fixed bugs for users having
> hundreds of thousands of tasks. :)
>
Ok... might have been an issue with MY system then... *shrug* Who knows... :-)
>
John Aldrich wrote:
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 4:38 am, Duncan wrote:
Just noting for others reading now or from the archives that a bug has
been filed (with several duplicates already) and is being looked into.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354779
For reference tho, sometimes get
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 4:38 am, Duncan wrote:
>
> Just noting for others reading now or from the archives that a bug has
> been filed (with several duplicates already) and is being looked into.
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354779
>
> For reference tho, sometimes getting a disc
John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 13 Nov
2006 13:18:32 -0500:
> Charles, et al:
> It appears that there is an issue in restarting downloads[]
>
> Might I recommend this problem be looked into? I'll file a bug report. I
> don't know how reproducea
10 matches
Mail list logo
