Artur Jachacy wrote:
Well that's reason enough for me! UUCP should be good enough for all of
you, with your newfangled NNTP and HTTP and stuff. And man, am I angry
that my ISP turned off telnet in favor of some upstart protocol called
SHH or something ;-)
So, I take it you're prepared to
walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:42:47
-0700:
> The subject of threading in binaries groups has always confused me anyway,
> and I've never figured out how to do exactly what I really want: i.e.
> sort posts in roughly chronological order
Hi Steve, *,
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:11:46AM +0100, Steve Davies wrote:
> On 7/11/06, jef_e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Artur Jachacy wrote:
> >> Charles Kerr wrote:
> >>> Can anyone think of a reason for Pan to /not/ behave that way?
> >
> >> Because that's not how it's been done. That shoul
jef_e wrote:
Artur Jachacy wrote:
Charles Kerr wrote:
Can anyone think of a reason for Pan to /not/ behave that way?
Because that's not how it's been done. That should be reason enough.
Well that's reason enough for me! UUCP should be good enough for all of
you, with your newfangled NNTP
On 7/11/06, jef_e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Artur Jachacy wrote:
> Charles Kerr wrote:
>> Can anyone think of a reason for Pan to /not/ behave that way?
> Because that's not how it's been done. That should be reason enough.
:) I can kind of agree with the sentiment...
In fact I think that th
Artur Jachacy wrote:
> Charles Kerr wrote:
>> Can anyone think of a reason for Pan to /not/ behave that way?
> Because that's not how it's been done. That should be reason enough.
Well that's reason enough for me! UUCP should be good enough for all of
you, with your newfangled NNTP and HTTP and
Charles Kerr wrote:
In http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/pan-users/2006-07/msg00040.html
I asked for suggestions on user-friendly ways to sort threads by the
date of the thread's newest post, rather than (as Pan does now) by the
date of the thread's oldest post.
But stating it in those clear ter
Hi *,
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 07:28:05PM +, Duncan wrote:
> Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 10 Jul 2006
> 11:52:14 -0500:
>
> > In http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/pan-users/2006-07/msg00040.html I
> > asked for suggestions on user-frien
Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 10 Jul 2006
11:52:14 -0500:
> In http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/pan-users/2006-07/msg00040.html I
> asked for suggestions on user-friendly ways to sort threads by the date of
> the thread's newest post, rather
