Artur Jachacy wrote: > Charles Kerr wrote: >> Can anyone think of a reason for Pan to /not/ behave that way?
> Because that's not how it's been done. That should be reason enough. Well that's reason enough for me! UUCP should be good enough for all of you, with your newfangled NNTP and HTTP and stuff. And man, am I angry that my ISP turned off telnet in favor of some upstart protocol called SHH or something.... ;-) > How about the order of threads being messed up by a "me too" post sent a > week after the thread has died? But yeah, I can see where this might be one of those things that might be better as an option rather than an exclusive behavior. I'm not a fan of this kind of threading - when I sort on date, I like things from the same date to all be together - not jumbled around within various threads. As an option like "sort thread by most recent post date", I can see where some folks would find it useful -- after, I also hate threading email messages, but I know some folks who do it. jef _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
