On Sat, Sep 22, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I assume that the umlaut over the и is just for the look, and
> doesn't change the pronunciation.
IIRC it does. It turns a hard vocal into a soft one.
--Daniel
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
ht
Hi,
GCC 4.4 again requires some minor changes to pan.
Patch attached.
-Daniel
Index: pan/general/log.cc
===
--- pan/general/log.cc.orig 2007-08-01 19:00:01.0 +0200
+++ pan/general/log.cc 2009-02-27 23:24:38.0 +0100
Julien,
On Thursday 09 October 2008 18:12:41 Julien Michielsen wrote:
> pan-lang-0.132-120.1
Just delete this specific package. I have the language files merged back
with the main package in 0.133.
Maintaining a separate language package is IMHO just not worth the
effort for a program as lean
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 16:58:29 Julien Michielsen wrote:
> Yes, I did (and do) still use .132 (pan-0.132-120.1, SuSE-11). Tried
> to install .14 but ran into compilation errors, and re-installed the
> .132-rpm.The program starts fine, and collects messages from the
> server.
Not having look
On Thursday 04 September 2008 13:03:52 CSV4ME2 wrote:
> ru = russia
> The name is probably in Cyrillic.
> If I may offer a guess,
Correct. The Cyrillic spelling for "Administrator", according to the few
bits of Russian I had in school.
-Daniel
___
Pa
On Monday 07 April 2008 20:40:54 Duncan wrote:
> I've sent him back a version to test on systems he has there, that if
> I'm correct, is the minimal include for at least 2.12 thru 2.16, and
> probably from 2.4 or 2.6.
I have tested the version I posted some minutes ago down to SuSE Linux
9.3, i
system starts talking to me again, I'll go down in
the revision history and check older glib versions.
-Daniel
From: Daniel Rahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: abstract glib API
Glib API may change with minor releases. This patch abstracts glib
somehow from the various PAN source files to c
On Saturday 05 April 2008 03:24:26 Keith Richie wrote:
> That's something I don't understand. Why there would be a want to
> retain backwards compatibility with an older version of glib that is
> from July 2007 (2.12.13) Granted Debian Stable uses this version, but
> there is also a .deb for pan 0.
On Sunday 30 March 2008 14:31:15 Beso wrote:
> other distros have usually precompiled binaries, and thus with known
> glib version, so once the problem is identified and known i don't
> think that should be difficult for them to prebuild the right stuff.
> also, their installers usually just instal
On Sunday 30 March 2008 16:17:43 Duncan wrote:
> Note that I'm normally building (and therefore patching against)
> live-svn (which has been revision 335 thru all of this, no updates),
> but I tried 0.132 here too, just to be sure. Same errors. The patch
> applies fine but the compile fails with
On Saturday 29 March 2008 22:00:35 Duncan wrote:
> Wouldn't this be a pan implementation, not external, so therefore
> should be quotes not angle-brackets? Like so (and is the relative
> path still correct in that case?):
>
> + #include "pan/general/glib-compat.h"
If you do it this way, the rela
On Friday 28 March 2008 21:11:52 Duncan wrote:
> So now he's looking at doing something with #if (GLIB_MAJOR_VERSION
> == 2 && GLIB_MINOR_VERSION < 16) type hackery, which is more or less
> what I had expected might be needed, only he actually knows enough
> about it to probably pull it off, while
On Friday 28 March 2008 21:11:52 Duncan wrote:
> So now he's looking at doing something with #if (GLIB_MAJOR_VERSION
> == 2 && GLIB_MINOR_VERSION < 16) type hackery, which is more or less
> what I had expected might be needed, only he actually knows enough
> about it to probably pull it off, while
On Thursday 27 March 2008 14:16:01 Duncan wrote:
> Finally got it compiling and a new version installed now. Updated
> the bug, now time to restart pan and see if it actually works. =8^)
I still think the best option would be to replace any includes of glib/*
with just glib.h. That will pull in
On Thursday 27 March 2008 12:50:41 Duncan wrote:
> Keith Richie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 24 Mar
> 2008
>
> 18:50:25 +:
> > Upgraded to gcc4.3 today on Arch 64bit. Copy, pasted and applied
> > the undiluted patch, everything went well from a fres
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 10:52:16 Duncan wrote:
> ... which is why in theory no x.y.1 is ever needed, right. =8^)
Well, I was only referring to the traces I saw, which were reported to
our GCC guys here and therefore were fixed one way or another.
There will of course be so many we did not catch
On Monday 24 March 2008 03:36:22 Duncan wrote:
> FWIW, based only on a short visual scan, it looks to be doing all the
> right things based on the gcc 4.3 porting doc and my experience so
> far. So even if it doesn't happen to be workable (haven't tried it
> yet), it looks to be headed there.
We h
On Monday 03 September 2007 10:36:45 Thufir wrote:
> Thanks. I wasn't sure at first, but now I'm certain it's a leafnode
> issue. Your troubleshooting was quite helpful :)
Is your leafnode binary installed to /usr/sbin/ as the config file
states?
A connection being closed with xinetd managed s
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 08:05 +0930, arndalebilo wrote:
> I've taken to building Pan from source in order to get the spellchecker
> working in SUSE 10.1.
The beta packages I provide all have the spellchecker turned on.
Just add this repo to your installation sources and you will get the
weekly be
Am Dienstag, den 02.05.2006, 20:20 -0700 schrieb Duncan:
> Problem related to that. How in the world do I type in a path in the save
> dialog? There's no place to type it!!! I'd call that a UI bug.
That's a GNOME/Gtk filechooser design decision ;-)
Press Ctrl+L in the dialog.
-Daniel
_
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 11:37 -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> Maybe it was real and just before my time - but it seems like geek humor
> to me.
You are right on target with your analysis.
-Daniel
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http:
21 matches
Mail list logo
