On Tuesday 25 March 2008 10:52:16 Duncan wrote: > ... which is why in theory no x.y.1 is ever needed, right. =8^)
Well, I was only referring to the traces I saw, which were reported to our GCC guys here and therefore were fixed one way or another. There will of course be so many we did not catch. May the fun begin ;) -Daniel _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users