On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:03:57 +, Frank Tabor wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:18:25 -0500, Darren Albers wrote:
>
>> Frank Tabor wrote:
>>> On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:23:42 +0100, Michel Doucet wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hi,
Great work but the G shortcut does not lead anymore to the next unread
>
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:18:25 -0500, Darren Albers wrote:
> Frank Tabor wrote:
>> On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:23:42 +0100, Michel Doucet wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Great work but the G shortcut does not lead anymore to the next unread
>>> newgroup at the top of the list when you are at the bottom of t
Frank Tabor wrote:
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:23:42 +0100, Michel Doucet wrote:
Hi,
Great work but the G shortcut does not lead anymore to the next unread
newgroup at the top of the list when you are at the bottom of the list.
PS. Soorry for my bad English ;-)
That actually happened tw
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:23:42 +0100, Michel Doucet wrote:
> Hi,
> Great work but the G shortcut does not lead anymore to the next unread
> newgroup at the top of the list when you are at the bottom of the list.
>
> PS. Soorry for my bad English ;-)
That actually happened two releases ago. I had
Hi,
Great work but the G shortcut does not lead anymore to the next unread
newgroup at the top of the list when you are at the bottom of the list.
PS. Soorry for my bad English ;-)
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu
On Tue 06 Feb 2007 at 09:17:33 -0600, Charles Kerr wrote:
> Bug Tickets addressed in this release:
> 404515 0.122 build problems in pan/po/Makefile (Pteer)
It also makes it work again with make rather than gmake. Thanks!
-Olaf.
--
___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- You author it, and I'll reade
[EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 06 Feb 2007 16:47:27
-0500:
> I created the %HOME% variable because I was using some
> other *nix programs that were ported to MS and they needed it. I had
> a slight panic the first time I started Pan after creating the
> vari
Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 06 Feb 2007
20:25:54 -0600:
> Duncan wrote:
>
>> Note that the patch I mentioned there as being in current SVN is already
>> applied to 0.123, so if it still exists (I've only started pan once since
>> the upgrad