Douglas Bollinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 16 Sep 2006
19:44:25 -0400:
> LOL. I guess I should have scrolled down to the rest of the new messages, for
> Charles already added prefs/newsrc save upon changing groups. Awesome!
Yeah, this 1.0 IS going
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:00:16 -0500, Charles Kerr wrote:
>>> I've attached a patch for this in
>>> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=72912&action=view .
>> Thanks for working on this, Charles. I tried the patch but nothing
>> changed -- the 'Custom Path' is still pre-selected.
> And th
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:36:52 -0400
Douglas Bollinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I totally agree. Prefs aren't a worry at all, but the newsrc file
> should be saved whenever you switch groups just to be on the safe side because
> you can easily lose a lot of work. If the newsrc is saved w
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:38:33 + (UTC)
"Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OTOH, newsrc, tracking the posts read and those not, THAT's the big
> problem here. Pan crashes at the wrong time, and it's hundreds of posts
> to go thru in the text groups or thousands in the binary groups, trying
"Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:22:39
+:
> I'm running it now. Fortunately for me, unfortunately for testing,
> whatever was crashing pan isn't happening here, so I can't tell you about
> that, but I can test this, with killall -
Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 16 Sep 2006
17:38:49 -0500:
> I've added a patch to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349044 .
>
> Please give it a try and let me know how it goes.
> Everything that's saved on shutdown, should now also
Duncan wrote:
> Thus, I don't see what the big deal is on saving prefs, but read message
> tracking is a HUGE problem.
>
Ahh, not important to *you* ;-) I often change things in there,
especially when testing, as I look for better font choices, score
colors, which headings to show, etc.
If I ev
walt wrote:
I've commented twice before that IMO the current behavior of the
'Save Articles' dialog box is backwards: the 'Custom Path' is
selected by default, forcing me to change it back to 'Group's
Default Path' every time I save something.
I've attached a patch for this in
http://bugzill
jef_e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 16 Sep 2006
15:36:50 -0400:
> Initially discussion was about .newsrc, however, preferences.xml also
> doesn't get saved. Saving that at edit time shouldn't be a performance
> problem, should it? If the newsrc is a perfor
Am I mission a setting or something? Otherwise, this is a major
showstopper for me.
You aren't missing a setting. I've experienced the same problems and in
fact I believe it's my bug. However, Charles says implementing state
saving could be a real drag on performance.
If it's a drag, then d
jef_e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 16 Sep
2006 15:44:40 -0400:
> Heh - ooops - thats what happens when I don't doublecheck :)
>
> Seems I clicked on the wrong message there to reply too - my previous
> message should be in reply to Duncan's other message
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:14:10 -0500, Charles Kerr wrote:
> walt wrote:
>
>> Hi Charles,
>>
>> I've commented twice before that IMO the current behavior of the
>> 'Save Articles' dialog box is backwards: the 'Custom Path' is
>> selected by default, forcing me to change it back to 'Group's
>> Defa
walt wrote:
Hi Charles,
I've commented twice before that IMO the current behavior of the
'Save Articles' dialog box is backwards: the 'Custom Path' is
selected by default, forcing me to change it back to 'Group's
Default Path' every time I save something.
Is this your intended behavior for th
On Saturday 16 September 2006 14:48, Duncan wrote:
> Brian Pack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 16 Sep
>
> 2006 14:04:59 -0400:
> > [Charles Kerr wrote...]
> >
> >>Not very many bugs were reported this week, and most of them were
> >>enhancement requests. E
On Sep 16, 2006, at 1:04 PM, Brian Pack wrote:
If I know I'm going to go back and read a group later, I absolutely
*must*
close Pan before I go back and do anything else. I've lost count at
how many
times I've been browsing the 20th newsgroup of a session, only to
have Pan
crash without wa
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:49:59 +, Duncan wrote:
> "walt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:46:03
> +:
>
>> I've commented twice before that IMO the current behavior of the
>> 'Save Articles' dialog box is backwards: the 'Custom Path' i
Heh - ooops - thats what happens when I don't doublecheck :)
Seems I clicked on the wrong message there to reply too - my previous
message should be in reply to Duncan's other message about 0.112, in
reply to Brian Pack about things not getting saved.
Sorry for any confusion!
jef_e wrote:
> Br
Duncan wrote:
> "walt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:46:03
> +:
>
>> I've commented twice before that IMO the current behavior of the
>> 'Save Articles' dialog box is backwards: the 'Custom Path' is
>> selected by default, forcing me
"walt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:46:03
+:
> I've commented twice before that IMO the current behavior of the
> 'Save Articles' dialog box is backwards: the 'Custom Path' is
> selected by default, forcing me to change it back to 'Gro
Brian Pack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 16 Sep
2006 14:04:59 -0400:
> [Charles Kerr wrote...]
>>Not very many bugs were reported this week, and most of them were
>>enhancement requests. Either 0.112 is working pretty well, or everyone's
>>burned out from
>I think I'll pass on a release this weekend -- there's nothing
>really new except a small threading speed tweak and maybe 2M
>of memory shaved off the 'top'.
>The reason for this slow cycle? Not very many bugs were
>reported this week, and most of them were enhancement requests.
>Either 0.112 is
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 22:45:52 +, charles kerr wrote:
> I think I'll pass on a release this weekend -- there's nothing
> really new except a small threading speed tweak and maybe 2M
> of memory shaved off the 'top'.
>
> The reason for this slow cycle? Not very many bugs were
> reported this we
> Just downloaded 0.112 from http://panbuilds.googlepages.com/. I can move
> from group to group at will unless I've read a message. Once I read a
> message, any attempt to move to a different group causes pan to become
> "non-responsive". Haven't see this behaviour on an of the prior betas.
nev
Just downloaded 0.112 from http://panbuilds.googlepages.com/. I can move
from group to group at will unless I've read a message. Once I read a
message, any attempt to move to a different group causes pan to become
"non-responsive". Haven't see this behaviour on an of the prior betas.
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 22:45:52 + (UTC)
"charles kerr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I'll pass on a release this weekend -- there's nothing
> really new except a small threading speed tweak and maybe 2M
> of memory shaved off the 'top'.
>
> T
25 matches
Mail list logo
