Heh - ooops - thats what happens when I don't doublecheck :) Seems I clicked on the wrong message there to reply too - my previous message should be in reply to Duncan's other message about 0.112, in reply to Brian Pack about things not getting saved.
Sorry for any confusion! jef_e wrote: > Brian Packposted >> > [Charles Kerr wrote...] >>> >>Not very many bugs were reported this week, and most of them were >>> >>enhancement requests. Either 0.112 is working pretty well, or everyone's >>> >>burned out from the weekly betas. >>> >>If it's the former, then RC1 should be the next release IMO. > duncan wrote >> > It's been bugged before, but the not saving the group status and what >> > has or hasn't been read until the app has closed is driving me batty. >> > >> > I've gotten to the point where I simply cannot trust Pan to properly >> > save it's status over an extended session. > This one was posted by Glyn Parker > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349044 > I posted to the list in reference to this as well quite a while back, too. > > You (Duncan) filed this one > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349188 > but Charles marked it as a duplicate. > > Initially discussion was about .newsrc, however, preferences.xml also > doesn't get saved. Saving that at edit time shouldn't be a performance > problem, should it? If the newsrc is a performance issue, I'd settle for > at least prefs getting saved :) > > That being said, 0.112 has been pretty solid here so far. Still a few > things I'd like to see, but it's mostly wishlist stuff. Stability and > speed have been wonderful. _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
