在 2020/11/18 6:43, Cong Wang 写道:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 8:06 PM wenxu wrote:
>>
>> On 11/17/2020 3:01 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 5:06 AM wenxu wrote:
在 2020/11/15 2:05, Cong Wang 写道:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:44 PM wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/sched/act_fr
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 8:06 PM wenxu wrote:
>
>
> On 11/17/2020 3:01 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 5:06 AM wenxu wrote:
> >>
> >> 在 2020/11/15 2:05, Cong Wang 写道:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:44 PM wrote:
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_frag.c b/net/sched/act_frag.c
> >>
On 11/17/2020 3:01 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 5:06 AM wenxu wrote:
>>
>> 在 2020/11/15 2:05, Cong Wang 写道:
>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:44 PM wrote:
diff --git a/net/sched/act_frag.c b/net/sched/act_frag.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..3a7ab92
--- /
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 5:06 AM wenxu wrote:
>
>
> 在 2020/11/15 2:05, Cong Wang 写道:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:44 PM wrote:
> >> diff --git a/net/sched/act_frag.c b/net/sched/act_frag.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000..3a7ab92
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/net/sched/act_frag.c
> >
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 2:46 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
> Davide had shared similar concerns with regards of the new module too.
> The main idea behind the new module was to keep it as
> isolated/contained as possible, and only so. So thumbs up from my
> side.
>
> To be clear, you're only t
On 11/16/2020 12:26 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> This nagged me:
> What happens if all the frags dont make it out?
> Should you at least return an error code(from tcf_fragment?)
> and get the action err counters incremented?
Thanks, Will do.
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
> On 2020-11-15 8:05 a.m., wenxu
This nagged me:
What happens if all the frags dont make it out?
Should you at least return an error code(from tcf_fragment?)
and get the action err counters incremented?
cheers,
jamal
On 2020-11-15 8:05 a.m., wenxu wrote:
在 2020/11/15 2:05, Cong Wang 写道:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:44 PM wrote
在 2020/11/15 2:05, Cong Wang 写道:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:44 PM wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/sched/act_frag.c b/net/sched/act_frag.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..3a7ab92
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/net/sched/act_frag.c
> It is kinda confusing to see this is a module. It provides some
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 10:05:39AM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:44 PM wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> > index 9c79fb9..dff3c40 100644
> > --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
> > +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> > @@ -1541,8 +1541,14 @@ static int __init ct_i
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:44 PM wrote:
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> index 9c79fb9..dff3c40 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> @@ -1541,8 +1541,14 @@ static int __init ct_init_module(void)
> if (err)
> goto err_register
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 23:25:22 -0300 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 02:20:58PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:24:57 +0800 we...@ucloud.cn wrote:
> > > v7-v10: fix __rcu warning
> >
> > Are you reposting stuff just to get it build tested?
> >
>
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 02:20:58PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:24:57 +0800 we...@ucloud.cn wrote:
> > v7-v10: fix __rcu warning
>
> Are you reposting stuff just to get it build tested?
>
> This is absolutely unacceptable.
I don't know if that's the case, but maybe we c
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:24:57 +0800 we...@ucloud.cn wrote:
> v7-v10: fix __rcu warning
Are you reposting stuff just to get it build tested?
This is absolutely unacceptable.
From: wenxu
Currently kernel tc subsystem can do conntrack in cat_ct. But when several
fragment packets go through the act_ct, function tcf_ct_handle_fragments
will defrag the packets to a big one. But the last action will redirect
mirred to a device which maybe lead the reassembly big packet ove
14 matches
Mail list logo
