On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 2:46 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Davide had shared similar concerns with regards of the new module too. > The main idea behind the new module was to keep it as > isolated/contained as possible, and only so. So thumbs up from my > side. > > To be clear, you're only talking about the module itself, right? It > would still need to have the Kconfig to enable this feature, or not?
Both. The code itself doesn't look like a module, and it doesn't look like an optional feature for act_ct either, does it? If not, there is no need to have a user visible Kconfig, we just select it, or no Kconfig at all. Thanks.
