On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:20:43 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 19 octobre 2020 17:53 -07, Jakub Kicinski:
> > I'm not hearing any objections, but I have two questions:
> > - do you intend to merge it for 5.10 or 5.11? Because it has a fixes
> >tag, yet it's marked for net-next. If we put it in
❦ 19 octobre 2020 17:53 -07, Jakub Kicinski:
> I'm not hearing any objections, but I have two questions:
> - do you intend to merge it for 5.10 or 5.11? Because it has a fixes
>tag, yet it's marked for net-next. If we put it in 5.10 it may get
>pulled into stable immediately, knowing how
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 20:56:36 -0600 David Ahern wrote:
> On 10/19/20 6:53 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 14:50:11 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote:
> >> Introduced in 0eeb075fad73, the "ignore_routes_with_linkdown" sysctl
> >> ignores a route whose interface is down. It is provided as
[ fix Andy's address ]
On 10/17/20 6:50 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Introduced in 0eeb075fad73, the "ignore_routes_with_linkdown" sysctl
> ignores a route whose interface is down. It is provided as a
> per-interface sysctl. However, while a "all" variant is exposed, it
> was a noop since it was ne
On 10/19/20 6:53 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 14:50:11 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote:
>> Introduced in 0eeb075fad73, the "ignore_routes_with_linkdown" sysctl
>> ignores a route whose interface is down. It is provided as a
>> per-interface sysctl. However, while a "all" variant is ex
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 14:50:11 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Introduced in 0eeb075fad73, the "ignore_routes_with_linkdown" sysctl
> ignores a route whose interface is down. It is provided as a
> per-interface sysctl. However, while a "all" variant is exposed, it
> was a noop since it was never evalua
Introduced in 0eeb075fad73, the "ignore_routes_with_linkdown" sysctl
ignores a route whose interface is down. It is provided as a
per-interface sysctl. However, while a "all" variant is exposed, it
was a noop since it was never evaluated. We use the usual "or" logic
for this kind of sysctls.
Teste
