❦ 19 octobre 2020 17:53 -07, Jakub Kicinski:
> I'm not hearing any objections, but I have two questions:
> - do you intend to merge it for 5.10 or 5.11? Because it has a fixes
> tag, yet it's marked for net-next. If we put it in 5.10 it may get
> pulled into stable immediately, knowing how things work lately.
I have never been super-familiar with net/net-next. I am always using
net-next and let people sort it out.
> - we have other sysctls that use IN_DEV_CONF_GET(), e.g.
> "proxy_arp_pvlan" should those also be converted?
I can check them and do that.
--
Use library functions.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
