On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:20:43 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 19 octobre 2020 17:53 -07, Jakub Kicinski: > > I'm not hearing any objections, but I have two questions: > > - do you intend to merge it for 5.10 or 5.11? Because it has a fixes > > tag, yet it's marked for net-next. If we put it in 5.10 it may get > > pulled into stable immediately, knowing how things work lately. > > I have never been super-familiar with net/net-next. I am always using > net-next and let people sort it out.
Since there is some breakage potential I'd prefer to merge this change into net-next and give it more testing. But net-next is currently closed (don't pay attention to the graphic at vger). If you wouldn't mind - please repost next week. You can split out and repost the documentation change separately if you want, that's a fix that can go into net right away. > > - we have other sysctls that use IN_DEV_CONF_GET(), e.g. > > "proxy_arp_pvlan" should those also be converted? > > I can check them and do that.
