Hmm, some further digging suggests it may be some badly written multi-threading
tests :
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2433700/nunit-console-exe-hangs-after-finishing-test-run
I'll fix up the tests and see what happens.
From: David Keaveny
Sent: Thursday, 10 June 2010 10:23 AM
To: nant-user
Mark,
Running NAnt in debug should at least give you a stacktrace that we can use to
find the cause.
I'm convinced this isn't a NUnit issue, so perhaps we should move this thread
to the nant-users mailing list.
Gert
From: Mark Mayo
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 4:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 6:27 PM
> To: Erich Eichinger; Bob Archer; SPEAR, Adrian, GBM;
> nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
>
>
> Erich or Bob, can you verify whether COMPLUS_VERSION
> o
ED]>; "SPEAR, Adrian, GBM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Ok - obviously I still owe you some piece of information ;-)
I'm want to build & test the same sources against all different platforms +
t: Friday, May 04, 2007 3:14 PM
To: Erich Eichinger; Gert Driesen; SPEAR, Adrian, GBM;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
X-ExchangeSecure-AntiSpam: valid(71)
Ok,
Maybe I'm co
To: Erich Eichinger; SPEAR, Adrian, GBM; Bob Archer;
> nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
>
> Hi Erich,
>
> 1) I know about the COMPLUS_VERSION "trick", but instead I
> was planning on including versions of NUnit that have b
ED]>; "SPEAR, Adrian, GBM"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bob Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 11:31 AM
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
No prob ;-)
While looking for an easy solution to launch the nunit-console.exe using the
, Adrian, GBM; Bob Archer;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Maybe my proposal is misleading:
the "--runtime==" argument from my example is only passed to the
runtimeengine - and only if it is specified in the framework configuration
in nant.
Sent: Fri 2007-05-04 10:17
To: Erich Eichinger; 'SPEAR, Adrian, GBM'; 'Bob Archer';
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Eric,
Not everyone program you start using will like the --runtime=
argument. Configuring it on the f
t me to it ;-)
Gert
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erich
Eichinger
Sent: vrijdag 4 mei 2007 10:09
To: Gert Driesen; SPEAR, Adrian, GBM; Bob Archer;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
After playing around a
;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
You're wrong on this. Unless if you're sure that your build file will allow
you to run your unit tests on Mono or a specific version of the MS CLR ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
find anything in the
documentation.
tia,
Erich
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Keaveny
Sent: Fri 2007-05-04 01:04
To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Of course, the alternative solution is t
CTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
Archer
Sent: Thursday, 3 May 2007 11:22 PM
To: Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Nothing against Nant. But, this is the reason a lot of people recommend
running NUni
mei 2007 16:36
To: Gert Driesen; Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
I think it would. Decoupling Nant from a specific NUnit version would be
very useful. Would you have to specify the path the EXE also? I personally
don't in
n'; Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
To be honest - I don't see the need for a task to wrap nunit-console and
the
like (e.g. ncover.console.exe).
As Bob states - just use an exec task to invoke the console
ed in the post though ;0)
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 May 2007 17:33
To: SPEAR, Adrian, GBM; 'Bob Archer'; 'Erich Eichinger';
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
You're w
7 16:03
To: 'Gert Driesen'; Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
To be honest - I don't see the need for a task to wrap nunit-console and the
like (e.g. ncover.console.exe).
As Bob states - just use an exec t
following some of JP Boodhoo's suggestions.)
BOb
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 9:52 AM
To: Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Hi Bob,
I'
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gert Driesen
Sent: 03 May 2007 14:52
To: Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Hi Bob,
I've been planning on adding an nunit-console task would be basically just
be wrapper ar
>From a user standpoint, I could definitely use that...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gert
Driesen
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 8:52 AM
To: Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NU
Would something like this be useful ?
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Erich Eichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Nothing against N
Nothing against Nant. But, this is the reason a lot of people recommend
running NUnit with the exec task.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erich
Eichinger
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 1:56 AM
To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Su
Hi Erich,
I'll look into this asap. I'm also gonna disucss the possibility to move the
NUnit task to the NUnit distribution with the NUnit team again.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "Erich Eichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 7:56 AM
Subject: [NAnt-users] NU
At 04:10 AM 1/19/2006, you wrote:
Hello, again
I have a second question on the way to run NUnit 2.2.5 tests with
nunit2 tasks. I switched from 2.2.0 to 2.2.5 to be able to compile
nunit tests with .NET 2.0, but am now unable to execute them with
NAnt. I saw the bindingredirect element in the
Also I used to use the task (I use the xsl files that
come with CruiseControl now) as well, but one thing I didn't do was use
the task.
You don't say what the error is, but I'm not sure what would happen if
you try to load tasks twice - could the instances conflict? What I did
was just put all
Hi there, if you are having issues with the you could
try just grabbing the xsl and using the task:
Paul...I hear you. I have run into problems as
well. I haven't had the time to generate a small repo of my problem, but
if you do I think that would help all of us identify the problem. When I
try to run it I get an exception thrown.
Jason
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
But there is an nunit2report and a nunitreport tag.
I take it these work??
_
VirusChecked for Huntsworth plc
_
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: donderdag 14 april 2005 23:02
> To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nant-users] NUnit 2.2
>
> We were planning on holding off upgrading from Nant 0.84 final
I downloaded the rc1 and the sample Build works right off the box. No path
errors with this one.
thanks,
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian MacLean
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Nunit test on sample build failed with VisualCpp
You&#x
Aaron Seet wrote:
Seems like i'm not the only one getting the build failure of 2003 (expected
2004) in 0.84 the first time it's installed :)
After much tracing I found that it checks the copyright notice (as opposed
to the assembly build number + 2000/1/1), so adjusting that to 2004 made it
sweet.
1. A
2. I use to compile my projects, and have the references
sorted out in my Visual Studio projects in a solution.
3.
4. Usually compile with VS, finding syntax errors is easier from its task
list, and then run the tests with Nant in a command line window. I have my
tests in a sepe
1. A
3. NUnit2
4. To facilitate debugging, we use the
task. In some cases, we need some prebuild and postbuild steps
in VS to support things like using CodeSmith for our codegeneration.
5. Use NReport to compile them and feed
them to CruiseControl (or Draco if you want). CruiseControl t
>From: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 10:27 AM
...
> If I'm not mistaken, Charlie Poole (NUnit) actually did not really
recommend
> upgrading to this version. But I'd have to verify that.
Your recollection is more or less correct. The 2.2.1 release is an
ite
Title: NUnit 2.2.1
Tom,
If I'm not mistaken, Charlie Poole (NUnit) actually did not
really recommend upgrading to this version. But I'd have to verify
that.
Gert
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whitner,
TomSent: donderdag 11 november 2004 16:15
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] NUnit 2.2?
Try "nunit >nunit.out 2>&1"
If that doesn't work try "nunit >nunit.out 2>nunit.err"
You could always try "nunit >nunit.out 2>nunit.out" but I'm not sure
what that would do...
---
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Burton,
Kevin
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 2:23 PM
To: Gert Driesen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] NUnit 2.2?
Thank you. I was not using the nightly build. Now I am and the tests run
without exceptions. FYI, the docs still reference V2.1 for .
day, September 23, 2004 3:06 PM
To: Burton, Kevin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] NUnit 2.2?
> - Original Message -
> From: "Burton, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 9:47 PM
> Subject:
- Original Message -
From: "Burton, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 9:47 PM
Subject: [Nant-users] NUnit 2.2?
I remember seeing some discussion of NUnit 2.2 a while back. What was the
conclusion?
I am trying to use and get a whole bu
Kevin,
The "testname" attribute is the fully qualified type name of the TestFixture
that you want to execute, not the name of an individual test...
In previous versions of NUnit (and therefore also in versions of NAnt prior
to recent nightly builds), you'd get a NullReferenceException when there'
et it working on my system at work - but not my system
at home.
Thanks - dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gert Driesen
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 1:42 AM
To: David Thielen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] nunit assembl
Hi David,
What version of NUnit is your test assembly built with ? What version of
NAnt are you using ?
About the assembly binding redirect : adding to to the NAnt configuration
file has no effect. You should add it to the application configuration file
for your test assembly, and if you don't
Hi Brian,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Yeo
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 10:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Nant-users] Nunit showing error in NAnt build but not in Nunit-GUI
Hi everyone,
I was able to run
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Pupek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NAnt Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:33 PM
Subject: [Nant-users] Nunit Failures
> Hey,
> What is the best way of testing for failures during the nunit2 task
> without setting the haltonerr
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 9:14 AM
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] NUnit
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenT
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 23:09, Markel, Kris wrote:
> You should also have these dlls in your bin directory:
> NAnt.NUnit.dll
> NAnt.NUnit1Tasks.dll
> NAnt.NUnit2Tasks.dll
>
> If any of these are missing, the NUnit tasks won't run.
>
> -k
It was that, those files were not compiled. Now Nant detects
il 08, 2004 2:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] NUnit
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 22:51, Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
> ?
/home/pre/Projects/orionsbelt/chronos/Chronos.build(72,3):
invalid element . Unknown task or datatype.
--
Pedro Santos
"Si minor plus est ergo nih
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 22:51, Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
> ?
/home/pre/Projects/orionsbelt/chronos/Chronos.build(72,3):
invalid element . Unknown task or datatype.
--
Pedro Santos
"Si minor plus est ergo nihil sunt omnia..."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
?
- Original Message -
From: "Pedro Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 11:33 PM
Subject: [Nant-users] NUnit
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutori
49 matches
Mail list logo
