Is there a better way to bundle or package non-core, user contributions? I
understand the need to separately encapsulate the core Nant functionality.
But I'm not sure if I understand the need to have a project that tries to
build all the extra bits into one thing (NAnt.Contrib.Tasks.dll). Seems lik
Simon,
I wouldn't turn to CCNet just for it's built in ability to work with SVN.
It's not at all difficult to run commands against SVN from NAnt. As a matter
of principle, all of our build files have the ability to update the local
copy of the source code they are building. This ensures that I can
Hi,
On Apr 21, 2010, at 7:33 AM, Martin Gainty wrote:
as a followup to ryan and gert on the build for 0.90
i tried downloading Visual Studio 2010 with .Net Framework 4.0 ..
after repeated crashes to my system i had to restore from backup
%NANT_HOME%\src\NAnt.DotNet\Tasks>csc csctask.cs
Mi
as a followup to ryan and gert on the build for 0.90
i tried downloading Visual Studio 2010 with .Net Framework 4.0 .. after
repeated crashes to my system i had to restore from backup
%NANT_HOME%\src\NAnt.DotNet\Tasks>csc csctask.cs
Microsoft (R) Visual C# .NET Compiler version 7.00.9951
for Mi
Looking at the page for the project on SourceForge, it looks like the last real
commit activity was "445 days" ago, although, there seems to be some defect
records that conflict with that number.
I look into it some more, I want to add some new custom tasks of mine, but, I
want to make sure tha
I've been using the exec task to run svn for years. nant contrib was just not
keeping up with svn changes.
From: Pento, Michael [mailto:mpe...@metratech.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:11 AM
To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [NAnt-users] NAntContrib seems rather dead?
As I wa
As I was sitting here wondering why the "svn" tasks in nantcontrib seemed so
incredibly broken, I realized that the contrib project has not had movement in
a long time.
I don't even know if the project is directly related to the main NAnt project
(ever or anymore ...), I was just curious if tha
CCNet is really designed for unattended builds. If no one is attending the
build (sitting at the console of the machine where ccnet is running) then who
is going to put in the credentials when Nant prompts for them?
BOb
From: Simon H [mailto:yo...@live.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 12:3
Why are you running builds against production databases. That seems wrong to
me. Your CI builds/test should be done against a test and/or staging database
that doesn't have sensitive data in it.
In other words your "development environment" should include a development only
DBs.
BOb
From: Si
One of the more recent editions of ccnet allows prompting the user for
parameters when a build is forced.
http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/CCNet+1.5+CTP+Releas
e+Notes
see the "Dynamic Parameters" section.
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:rongrabow...@yahoo.com]
Sent
10 matches
Mail list logo
