John quoth:
-> I noticed that has been depreciated. This should be reflected
-> in the documentation and an example of how the statement be used
-> instead of the .
Thanks for the heads-up John. Initially I thought deprecating
didn't seem right (weird looking test conditions)...but then I fo
That's perfect, I'll need to set up the environment variables.
is there a way to set up environment variables programatically? I'm working
with a bunch of people who are not used to using NAnt, and I'd like to be able
to just hit them with an install script that will set their path and
environmen
Hi,
I need to copy a compiled solution (containing multiple
projects) to a different location. All the files/projects in the solution exist
under a root directory. While copying, I need to copy everything as it is (directory structure of source directory)
except that I want to get rid o
Hi Todd.
> I have been using Nant for quite awhile now and am extremely happy
with it.
> I would not use anything else but my organization is questioning why
we
> hould be using Nant and not just use Visual Studio to do our builds. I
am
> having a hard time replying back to management in terms th
> Amen. Which means the server is carefully monitored for things which
> appear magically, it's backed up, and there's an as-built document so it
> can be recreated/verified should the need arise.
>
> Too anal? Not if you want reproducibility regardless of the catastrophic
> event (like installing
For me, there is a very simple answer to this questions. The process of
building a software package involves many tasks. Only one of these
tasks is the actual compilation of the source into binaries. Hence,
only one of these tasks can be done by Visual Studio (that's a slight
over-simplification
I noticed that has been depreciated. This should be reflected in
the documentation and an example of how the statement be used instead
of the .
Thanks,
John Cole
-
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the us
> the build server is supposed to only have the "approved"
> tools/utilities in the acceptable versions. This way you can be sure
> that you don't have an inadvertent dependency on some weird,
unsupported
> library. If it builds on the server, then you know it doesn't require
> anything not on th
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Gary Feldman
> Sent: donderdag 2 juni 2005 19:43
> To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Support for NUnit categories
>
> Gert Driesen wrote:
>
> >- Is it enough to be
Gert Driesen wrote:
- Is it enough to be able to define the complete set of categories globally
(meaning both the includes and excludes together), or do you want to be able
to define the includes and excludes seperately ?
I think the whole approach is overengineered.
It's one thing to use t
Foster, Richard - PAL wrote:
Gary,
Presumably with option 4 you could also do something like this
I.e. there would be a config.[whatever] file. (NOTE: I forced the file
name to lower case instead of upper just because I think config.dev
looks better as a filena
BILL:
> Your build environment should mirror the deployment environment
GARY:
> the build environment needs to mirror the development team's
environment
I think we have a situation where we are all in heated agreement, but
using a different set of definitions/assumptions/etc.
In my opinion, the
Bill Martin wrote:
2) Your build environment should mirror the deployment environment as
closely as possible in terms of avaialble files etc. As in most cases VS
will not be installed on the target environment, then it should also not be
installed on the build machine. The build machine should
Malcolm,
I had a quick look, and there's really nothing weird going on.
The problem is that the error message is not clear. It mentions that a
directory could not be scanned, while in fact it should specify the assembly
that could not be scanned.
I fixed this in CVS.
The reason why you get this
Hi,
A while ago, support for including or excluding certain categories of
(N)unit tests was introduced in NAnt.
Now it seems that the implementation was not very good, and I'd like to
correct this.
To specify a set of categories to include/exclude, you have two options:
- either you specify the
Choose whichever one you think most appropriate. Personally, I'm fond
of 3 for most cases. Just try to design it with the goal of being
maintained by some junior build engineer who may not know much more than
JavaScript.
I've only caught the tail end of this thread so I haven't missed the
p
Title: Message
At one
place, we actually created a small C# applicaiton that walked the release
directory tree and recorded the version, size, and a checksum of each file
(executable and data files) in an xml file that was then copied to the final
build directory
Jeremy Owens-Boggs
[EMA
Gary,
Presumably with option 4 you could also do something like this
I.e. there would be a config.[whatever] file. (NOTE: I forced the file
name to lower case instead of upper just because I think config.dev
looks better as a filename than config.DEV!)
Regar
Wilson, Glenn wrote:
Hi Gary,
This is indeed the entire script. I wasn't sure how to perform this same
functionality using pure Nant, so I would be grateful for any pointers. I
took what I believed to be the easiest option from a coding perspective (I
am a .NET developer first and foremost).
Title: Stopping A Build
For the NUNIT2 task, although I had the 'failonerror'
attribute set to 'true' on the NUNIT2 task, I had that task running inside a
'foreach' loop which had a 'failonerror' attribute set to 'false'. When I
changed the attribute on the 'foreach' tag to 'failonerror=true
In addition to all this, database builds can also be automated. For this
one has to write a nant target that executes the sql script files
instead of executing the scripts manually one by one.
Shelly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EM
In my view, some reasons are:
1. It brings together the control of flow and extra build/packaging steps into
one technology, rather than having to write dos batch scripts (shiver) to hook
together many different tools.
2. By addmission of an MS consultant, Microsoft have never, and never will u
the failonerror="false" on the loop may have something to do with it.
rutger
- Original Message -
From: "Scott, Larry (TRIAD RESOURCES)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 21:52
Subject: [Nant-users] NUNIT2 Task Not Stopping After Failure
It appears that failures on NU
Hi Todd,
I second Thibaut's views on the 'why' of NAnt. The point about craftsman ->
industrial is an important one.
If you consider software activities to be part of a Innovate -> Iterate ->
Standardise -> Commoditise chain then any kind of work that you handle manually
will at best achieve
Susantha Kumara wrote:
Hi Ian,
Thank a lot for the prompt reply.
How can I change the settings in my app.exe.config ?.
At the moment I have an app.exe.config which is copied as is to the
deployment folder by the nant script. And I will have to change this
file in the deployment folder manuall
Hi Ian,
Thank a lot for the prompt reply.
How can I change the settings in my app.exe.config ?.
At the moment I have an app.exe.config which is copied as is to the
deployment folder by the nant script. And I will have to change this
file in the deployment folder manually before running the appli
Hi Todd,
just a few bits to reply to you, hoping this will help.
a metaphor which I found useful in situations like yours is that nant
is a precious tool when ones want to switch from craftsman way of work
to industrial way of work.
to me using only visual studio for builds makes it very difficu
Hi Gary,
This is indeed the entire script. I wasn't sure how to perform this same
functionality using pure Nant, so I would be grateful for any pointers. I
took what I believed to be the easiest option from a coding perspective (I
am a .NET developer first and foremost).
Regards
Glenn
Glenn W
Susantha Kumara wrote:
Hi all,
I use nant to build a C# .Net application which is dependent on an
external set of .Net assemblies. Each new release of these set of
external assemblies has slightly different assembly names ( Ex :
mylib-0.8.335.dll --> mylib-0.8.347.dll ).
So at the moment
Hi Rahul,
I have experienced a similar issue -
which turned out to be because I was using an older NAnt version, filterchain
is a relatively new feature - I think it came with 0.85.
NAnt will not crash in earlier versions,
it just ignores the extra tags.
Torben Rohde
Subsero A/S
Denmark
rah
I have had similar discusions in the past. There are lots of reasons for
using NAnt, but in my view, two of the key ones are:
1) Building with VS is unreliable as it used hint paths in the proj files to
resolve references. If it can't find an assembly where it thinks it should
be, then rather th
Hi,
I am trying to copy a file to antoher file. But while
copying i use a filter chain to change some of the
tokens with a value while copying.
The copy is working fine but the filterchain does not
work.
The code i am using is as follows:
Hi all,
I use nant to build a C# .Net application which is dependent
on an external set of .Net assemblies. Each new release of these set of
external assemblies has slightly different assembly names ( Ex : mylib-0.8.335.dll
à mylib-0.8.347.dll ).
So at the moment I have to change t
Just a thought, but have you tried / instead of \ ? I always use / as it is
unambiguous, whereas \ can be treated as an escape character and on
occasions, cause problems.
Cheers,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Malcolm
Anderson
Sent:
34 matches
Mail list logo
