Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011, NightStrike wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:18 AM, NightStrike
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Earnie
>>> wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>>
>> for LP64 that have long long as undefined. Can you link to
>> the C9
On Fri, 20 May 2011, NightStrike wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:18 AM, NightStrike wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Earnie wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
for LP64 that have long long as undefined. Can you link to the
C99 definition?
You need to consult the standard, which yo
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:18 AM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Earnie wrote:
>> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
for LP64 that have long long as undefined. Can you link to the
C99 definition?
>>>
>>> You need to consult the standard, which you buy from ISO.
>>>
>>
>>
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Earnie wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>> for LP64 that have long long as undefined. Can you link to the
>>> C99 definition?
>>
>> You need to consult the standard, which you buy from ISO.
>>
>
> That isn't going to happen.
It's free:
http://www.open-std.org/
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2011, Earnie wrote:
>
>> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>> On Tue, 17 May 2011, Earnie wrote:
>>>
NightStrike wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Earnie
> wrote:
>> RSPsoftware wrote:
>>> for years I was thinking that size of int and
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Earnie wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 May 2011, Earnie wrote:
>>
>>> NightStrike wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Earnie
wrote:
> RSPsoftware wrote:
>> for years I was thinking that size of int and long would
>> change to 8
>
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2011, Earnie wrote:
>
>> NightStrike wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Earnie
>>> wrote:
RSPsoftware wrote:
> for years I was thinking that size of int and long would
> change to 8
>
The you'll find http://www.unix.org
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Earnie wrote:
> NightStrike wrote:
>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Earnie
>> wrote:
>>> RSPsoftware wrote:
for years I was thinking that size of int and long would change
to 8
>>>
>>> The you'll find http://www.unix.org/whitepapers/64bit.html an
>>> intere
NightStrike wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Earnie
> wrote:
>> RSPsoftware wrote:
>>> for years I was thinking that size of int and long would change
>>> to 8
>>>
>>
>> The you'll find http://www.unix.org/whitepapers/64bit.html an
>> interesting read. Yea, it speaks relative to UNIX bu
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Earnie wrote:
> RSPsoftware wrote:
>> for years I was thinking that size of int and long would change to 8
>>
>
> The you'll find http://www.unix.org/whitepapers/64bit.html an
> interesting read. Yea, it speaks relative to UNIX but data is data
> regardless of th
RSPsoftware wrote:
> for years I was thinking that size of int and long would change to 8
>
The you'll find http://www.unix.org/whitepapers/64bit.html an
interesting read. Yea, it speaks relative to UNIX but data is data
regardless of the OS.
Earnie
-
for years I was thinking that size of int and long would change to 8
--- Em qua, 11/5/11, NightStrike escreveu:
De: NightStrike
Assunto: Re: [Mingw-users] thanks for mingw64
Para: arabco...@yahoo.com.br, "MinGW Users List"
, mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Data: Quarta-feira, 11 de Maio
Wrong list, but you're welcome :)
Use mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net in the future.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:50 AM, RSPsoftware wrote:
>
> I am amazed with the simplicity to convert ming32 projects as executables or
> dlls to ming64
> congratulations
>
---
13 matches
Mail list logo
