Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Fri, 20 May 2011, NightStrike wrote: > >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:18 AM, NightStrike >> <nightstr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Earnie >>> <ear...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: >>>> Prof Brian Ripley wrote: >>> >>>>>> for LP64 that have long long as undefined. Can you link to >>>>>> the C99 definition? >>>>> >>>>> You need to consult the standard, which you buy from ISO. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That isn't going to happen. > > In other words, we have to accept that one of the most vocal voices > on mingw.org is happy to be ignorant of a basic language standard. >
If that is what you read into it then fine. But I'm not going to be spending money on something that IMO should be provided for the benefit of all developers as a creative common document. >>> It's free: >>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1836.pdf >>> >> >> >>> Wrong spec... wrong language, even :) >> >> This is the right one: >> >> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf > > That is a committee draft of a revision-in-progress. You can find > final drafts of the actual C99 standard on the web, see e.g. > http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/open/n2794/n2794.pdf but ISO do not > allow copies of the actual standard to be distributed. Thanks for the links. While the final draft may be slightly different from the final product I'm happy to use it. Earnie ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
