On Fri, 20 May 2011, NightStrike wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:18 AM, NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Earnie <ear...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
for LP64 that have long long as undefined. Can you link to the
C99 definition?
You need to consult the standard, which you buy from ISO.
That isn't going to happen.
In other words, we have to accept that one of the most vocal voices on
mingw.org is happy to be ignorant of a basic language standard.
It's free:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1836.pdf
Wrong spec... wrong language, even :)
This is the right one:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf
That is a committee draft of a revision-in-progress. You can find
final drafts of the actual C99 standard on the web, see e.g.
http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/open/n2794/n2794.pdf but ISO do not
allow copies of the actual standard to be distributed.
--
Brian D. Ripley, rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
